Answer:
A. that involves double-counting.
Explanation:
Imagine a company that produces furniture. If we would include the wood, the nails, the wood paint, etc., were included in the calculation plus the furniture itself, you would be double-counting the cost of the manufactured furniture. If you consider waste materials, then you would be adding even more costs. That is why you only consider finished goods.
The correct answer is A. A publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use.
Explanation
Internal compliance is a set of strategic internal rules and measures focused on employee behavior and ethics. This internal Compliance was obtained with the aim of improving business practices aimed at raising the quality level of results, goals, and objectives. According to the above, the correct answer is "A. publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use." because this is an example of a business rule that pre-empted the misuse of company equipment preventing its employees from using it for purposes other than corporate ones.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) ensures that employees would be able to receive at least some pension benefits at the time of termination. ERISA is a federal law which establishes minimum standards for retirement (pension plans), health, and other welfare benefit plans, including life insurance.
Answer:
the answer is =32291.67.
The firm should take the advantage of the new quantity as the total cost is lesser as compared with the old supplier. the firm can save $340 by approximately taking the advantage of the new quantity discount.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
The Annual demand D = 5000 boxes
The Cost C = $6.4 per each box
The Carrying cost H = 25% of the unit cost = 0.25*6.4 = 1.6
The ordering costs S = $25.00
Now,
EOQ =√2DS/H
EOQ =√(2*5000 * 25)/1.6
Thus,
EOQ =Q = 395.28
The Total cost = DC + (Q/2)H + (D/Q)S
= 5000*6.4 + (395.28 /2) 1.6 + (5000/395.28)25
Then,
T = 32000 + 316.23 + 316.23
= 32632.46
So,
The new supplier has offered to sell the same item for the amount of $6.00 if Q = 3,000 boxes
Hence,
The total cost = 5000 * 6 + (3000/2)1.5 + (5000/3000)25
= 30000 + 2250 + 41.67
= 32291.67
Therefore, The firm should take the advantage of the new quantity as the total cost is lesser as compared with the old supplier. the firm can save $340 by approximately taking the advantage of the new quantity discount.
The statement, the more familiar customers are with a brand, the harder their decision-making process will be is false.
When the customers are more familiar with a brand, it is not always necessary that the decision-making process will be harder for them. The customers decision depends more on the economical factors as well.
The various brands does play an important role in influencing the customers decision-making process. Brands enable customers to quickly differentiate one firm or product from another.
Hence, it is not always the case where the customers who are familiar with the brand have hard time making decisions.
To learn more about the decision-making process here:
brainly.com/question/19901674
#SPJ4
