Answer:
to Smith only, or Jones only, or Smith and Jones
Explanation:
In this specific scenario, a proper indorsement of the check would be to Smith only, or Jones only, or Smith and Jones. That is because a check needs to be as specific as possible and cannot have various options. The check needs to be made to a single specific individual and if it is for more than one individual then both need to be included as a requirement (and). Making it so that both recipients must cash the check together for it to be accepted.
Answer:
Consider the following explanations
Explanation:
a. The whole argument is based on the controlling of different factors such as age, education and occupation among males and females. Now, this is very subjective how they have controlled occupation. For e.g. – Which all occupation they have considered for as stressful job, which all jobs they have considered as physical tiring jobs. Working in a refinery may be physical tiring job but then working in IT Company can also be tiring.
Therefore since there are lot of factors at play apart the one considered to calculate ratio’s we can say that these differential percentage points can always be more than or less than of what presented in question.
b. The same logic has to be applied to (b) as well. When we say that discrimination account for less than 8 percent of differential we implied to say that occupation nature may have more than 12 percent of differential. Now, if you use above logic and applied from occupation point of view.
Answer:
The answer is: the real gain in real GDP between 2010 and 2000 is 18.34%
Explanation:
First we have to determine the real GDP using the GDP deflator.
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP / real GDP) x 100
For year 2000:
24 = ($672 billion / real GDP ) x 100
2,400 = $672 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.28 billion
For year 2010:
51 = ($1,690 billion / real GDP ) x 100
5,100 = $1,690 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.331 billion
To calculate the real gain between real GDP from year 2000 to year 2010, we divide real GDP 2010 over real GDP 2000 and subtract 1:
($0.331 billion / $0.28 billion) -1 = 0.1834 x 100% = 18.34%
<span>Weather specialists or weathermen are reporters about weather
warnings, with no formal meteorological training. Even though they have no formal trainings, they are
important especially on major incidents because they are the ones who give
forecasts or weather warnings. In so doing, they can protect people’s life and
property. </span>
