1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iris [78.8K]
4 years ago
14

Please helo i will make brainless for correct answers!​

Mathematics
2 answers:
laiz [17]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

true

Step-by-step explanation:

100%=100 people

87%=x

cross multiply

100x=8700

divide both sides by 100

x=87 people

elena-s [515]4 years ago
7 0
False is the correct answer
You might be interested in
Whats the answer 6+1
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add 1 to six and u get seven.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP HIVE BRAINLYWho got the better deal in the Columbian Exchange: the Europeans or the Native Americans? Why?
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

the Europeans got the better deal from the Colombian Exchange

Step-by-step explanation:

In general, one would have to say that the Europeans got the better deal from the Columbian Exchange in that it facilitated the eventual establishment of colonies in the New World. That's not to say that it was all one-way traffic; however, the people of the New World undoubtedly benefitted in both the short and long-term by the introduction of crops and livestock. But such benefits proved to be more keenly felt by subsequent waves of European settlers than America's indigenous population.

After all, it wasn't much good for Native-Americans to have all these crops and all this livestock if, in due course, there'd be less land available for their use due to increased colonization. The indigenous peoples also suffered terribly from the introduction of diseases such as measles and smallpox, for which they had no natural immunity. It's difficult, then, to avoid the conclusion that the Europeans got the better deal from the Columbian Exchange (as it was probably intended that they should).

simply -

The Natives did benefit, but only for a short while, and the Europeans benefited the most

Kono Dio Da!!!

7 0
4 years ago
QUICK!!! HELP PLEASE!!!!
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

0 —> 15

1 —> 13.75

2 —> 12.5

3 —> 11.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Every time she drives for 1 hour, the car uses up 1.25 gallons of gas. If she fills it up and doesn't drive anywhere, the car will still be full with 15 gallons. If she drives for an hour, you would need to subtract 1.25 from 15 which would equal 13.75.

Then if she drives another hour, then you would subtract another 1.25 from 13.75.

Or a quicker way to do it would be if you multiply the number of hours driven by the gallons used per hour then subtract it from the filled up tank.... So for example if she drove 3 hours —> 3•1.25=3.75 then 15-3.75=11.25

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
REALLY NEED HELP AND WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLIEST!
katen-ka-za [31]
First, let’s break this down. What exactly are we looking at here? Well, Daisy measured the heights of 20 plants (in cm). The table, under Frequency, shows the # of plants that fit within a certain height range, shown on the left under Height of Plants (h).

Now, it says to take the midpoints of each group to figure out an estimate of the mean height. To find the mean, you add up all the totals and divide it by the # of items. So, let’s go through each row.

Midpoint of 0-10 is 5, and Frequency is 1, so that gives us 5.
Midpoint of 10-20 is 15, Frequency is 4, and 15x4=60.
We continue this with the other rows by finding the midpoint & multiplying the midpoint by the frequency (if the frequency is greater than 1). This gives us the numbers:

175 (25x7)
70 (35x2)
135 (45x3)
165 (55x3)

Now, we add these all together.
5+60+175+70+135+165=610

Finally, we divide 610 by the # of items (remember, there are 20 plants so we divide by 20) and 610/20 is 30.5.


FINAL ANSWER:

Thus, if I calculated correctly (which I hope I did lol), our estimate for the mean height of a plant is 30.5 cm!
4 0
3 years ago
Are these ratios equivalent?<br> 2:4 and 6:16
Grace [21]

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

2:4 is 1:2, 6:16 is not one half

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An employee earns $195 for 15 hours of work. Assuming he is paid by the hour, how much will the employee earn in 8 hours?
    5·1 answer
  • Example of when you would use the friendly numbers strategy to subtract
    12·1 answer
  • Represent the following sentence as an algebraic expression, where "a number" is the letter x.
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me with part C?
    5·1 answer
  • An object is translated by (x - 2, y - 6). If one point in the pre-image has the coordinates (-3, 7), what would be the coordina
    8·2 answers
  • What is the approximate value of Log Subscript 6 Baseline 25?
    12·2 answers
  • Some values of functions f, g, h, and k are provided in the
    13·1 answer
  • The following data set shows the times a product failed in a series of tests. What is the range of this data set? {16, 12, 19, 1
    15·1 answer
  • You were looking at your power bill for the month, you pay 12 cents per kilowatt-hour. Your power bill came out to $99.89 how ma
    8·1 answer
  • 15.<br> (4x +- 21)<br> (x - 23)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!