Answer:
Cost of Land is $104,000, cost of building is $653,000. The total cost is $757,000
Explanation:
The cost of the building will include the purchase price of the land and building and every other cost incurred in the process of making the land and building available for use.
However, every amount realized from the process will also be deducted from the cost of the land and building. To separate the cost of land from the cost of the building, we must identify the cost attributable to each of them
As such, the recorded cost on land
= $100,000 + $4,000
= $104,000
and cost of building
= $10,000 + $20,000 + $625,000 - $2,000
= $653,000
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Calibrate risks
.
Explanation:
Risk management is the process of planning, organization, management and control of the human and material resources of an organization, in order to minimize or exploit the risks and uncertainties of the organization.
Uncertainties represent risks and opportunities with the potential to destroy or create value. The company's risk management allows managers to effectively address uncertainties as well as the risks and opportunities associated with them, in order to improve the ability to generate value.
Value is maximized when the organization establishes strategies and objectives to achieve the ideal balance between growth objectives, return on investment and the risks associated with them, and to explore its resources effectively and efficiently in achieving the organization's objectives. .
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Fixed costs= $20,000
Unitary variable cost= $17
Selling price= $28 per unit.
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
Break-even point in units= 20,000 / (28 - 17)
Break-even point in units= 1,818 units
<u>Now, the profit for 1,500 units:</u>
Loss= 1,500*11 - 20,000= -$3,500
Answer:
affect nominal but not real variables. This view that money is ultimately neutral is consistent with classical theory.
Explanation:
This idea is held by classical economists (not by most economists) since they believe in the quantitative theory of money:
MV = PQ
- M = quantity of money
- V = velocity of money
- P = price level
- Q = quantity of goods
Classical theory was abandoned 90 years ago (according to classical theory, recessions were not possible and couldn't exist, but then the Great Depression came and the impossible became true). Neo-classical or monetarists appeared in the 1960s, and lately, neo-neo-classical appeared with George W. Bush. The problem with the quantitative theory is that it needs the following things to be true in order to hold, and empirical evidence over the last 90 years showed that none of them are true:
- the velocity of money has to be constant (AND IT IS NOT CONSTANT)
- real output is independent on money supply (NOT TRUE)
- causation goes from money to prices (MODERN ECONOMISTS BELIEVE IT IS THE OTHER WAY)
