1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vlabodo [156]
3 years ago
7

Where the american federal system recognizes strictly limited federal involvement n matters of state and local concern?

History
2 answers:
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
6 0

<span>Some people have questioned whether the grants in aid program gives the national government too much say in matters of State and local concern. The American federal system recognizes strictly limited federal involvement in matters of state and local concern arousing concern.</span>

Mars2501 [29]3 years ago
3 0

The American federal system recognizes strictly limited federal involvement by creating Dual Federalism. Dual federalism is the system that was created with the US Constitution because of the failure of the Articles of Confederation. This means that the states would have their power without interference from the federal government at the same time that the federal government has its powers that do not interfere with the powers of the state.

You might be interested in
The main purpose of the War Powers Act was to Group of answer choices show support for the troops. strengthen the president's po
adoni [48]

Answer:

<em>Reign in the war-making ability of the president</em>

Explanation:

  • The war power act is also called the War Powers Resolution. It was enacted in November 1973.
  • It was a congressional resolution, its main aim was to limit the president's power to escalate or initiate military actions in other parts of the world. It restricted the powers of the US president.
  • According to the law president had to notify Congress if he deploys the army. IT also limit the duration for which army can remain engaged without approval of the congress. It was enacted to avoid conflicts like Vietnam war. Many presidents have failed to comply with the regulations of the act and it effectiveness has also been questioned.
7 0
2 years ago
When winston churchill spoke in missouri about an iron curtain, he was referring to?
DaniilM [7]
The imaginary wall 
hope this helped
5 0
2 years ago
What were two reasons that Britain was opposed to the Soviet Union's occupation of Poland after World War II?
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

Britain was against communism, and the Soviet Union in Poland made the country a communist one. As well, they were losing trade with the country due to Soviet intervention in trades.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Supreme Court erode (destroy) the rights of African Americans?
Anton [14]
After the Civil War, 4 million former slaves were looking for social equality and economic opportunity. It wasn't clear initially whether they would enjoy full-fledged citizenship or would be subjugated by the white population.

In the 1860s, it was the Republican Party in Washington — the home of former abolitionists — that sought to grant legal rights and social equality to African-Americans in the South. The Republicans — then dubbed radical Republicans — managed to enact a series of constitutional amendments and reconstruction acts granting legal equality to former slaves — and giving them access to federal courts if their rights were violated.

The 13th Amendment, which was ratified in 1865, abolished slavery. Three years later, the 14th Amendment provided blacks with citizenship and equal protection under the law. And in 1870, the 15th Amendment gave black American males the right to vote.

Five years later, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875, a groundbreaking federal law proposed by Republican Sen. Charles Sumner of Massachusetts, which guaranteed that everyone in the United States was "entitled to the full and equal enjoyment" of public accommodations and facilities regardless of race or skin color.

3 0
3 years ago
Which statements accurately describe northern Italian Renaissance city-states?
sattari [20]
B) Many Italian city-states of the Renaissance were republics.

Explanation:
Italy was a group or the number of city-states, each of which has its own rule such as the Pope ruling in Rome, the Medici family that is ruling in Florence, the Doge basically ruling in Venice, the Sforza family served for ruling in Milan, the Este family which was ruling in the Ferrara and there is a long list that is consist of all the states of the cities and the ruling families of the ruling people.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Losses by Native Americans in Reconstruction Treaties?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following was generally accepted by the majority of American colonists as a legitimate use of Parliament's authorit
    9·1 answer
  • A government official who gives jobs to his or her relatives is engaging in what type of behavior?
    8·1 answer
  • During the Victorian age, the upper class became very wealthy in part by exploiting the lower classes, why?
    6·1 answer
  • 1. De Jure discrimination is established by _______?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the social structure of the New Mexico area before the U.S. required the land
    13·1 answer
  • Analyse the causes and origins of the employment dependency syndrome in zimbabwe​
    9·1 answer
  • Which person/group believed the New Deal represented an abuse of power by the president Franklin Roosevelt. ?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Does anyone know about the Native Americans??? I really need some help..
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!