Answer: 20%
Explanation:
The price elasticity of demand shows the increase in quantity demanded as a result of a decrease in price and vice versa.
It is calculated by the formula:
Price elasticity of demand = Change in quantity demanded / Change in price
The formula can therefore be used to find the increase in quantity. Price elasticities are usually denoted in negatives even if not shown so:
-4 = x / -5%
x = -4 * -5%
x = 20%
Answer: B. In the short run, the typical firm increases its output and makes an above normal profit.
Explanation:
I have attached a graph to explain.
Originally the Perfectly Competitive Market is in a long run Equilibrium.
This means that at 5000 units the $20 selling price was as a result of Marginal Revenue being equal to Marginal Cost.
Now a sudden change in Demand has taken the price up which then forces the Marginal Revenue Curve upwards.
This will culminate with the Marginal Revenue Curve now intersecting the Marginal Cost curve at a higher point being point F so that profit can be maximised.
This higher level will thus lead to a higher output than 5000 units at point Q as the firm will increase output.
Notice that at that point the Marginal Revenue is higher than Average Total Cost meaning that an Above normal profit is being made.
Do react or comment if you need any clarification.
Answer:
a. Net income in 2014 is $5.00 million; Net income in 2015 is $11.25 million; and Net income in 2016 is $8.75million.
b. The best summary is that under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the cost-to-cost method is a method that is acceptable to be applied to contracts that span more than one accounting period.
Therefore, the cost-to-cost method is employed in calculating the revenue and net income for Frankel Construction for each of the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Explanation:
a. Calculate the amount of revenue, expense, and net income for each of the three years 2014 through 2016 using the cost-to-cost method.
Note: See the attached excel file for the calculations.
Cost-to-cost method can be described as a cost and revenue recognition approach in which all costs recorded to date on a project are divided by the total expected costs to be incurred on the project in order to obtain the overall percentage of completion of the project which is employed in estimating revenue and net income.
b. What best summarizes our conclusion about the usefulness of the cost-to-cost method for this company?
The best summary is that under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the cost-to-cost method is a method that is acceptable to be applied to contracts that span more than one accounting period.
In this question, the cost-to-cost method is employed in calculating the revenue and net income for this company for each of the year 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Answer:
The Net Present Value = - 23056.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is $1,863 (U).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
Planned Activity = 20 days
Actual activity days = 23 days
Contribution margin = $621
Operating cost =- $15,060
So, we can calculate the activity variance by using following formula:
Activity Variance = ( Planned activity days - Actual activity days) × Contribution margin
By putting the value, we get
Activity variance = ( 20 - 23 ) × $621
= -3 × $621
= - $1,863 ( Negative shows unfavorable)
= $1,863 (U)