Answer: if it is based on the first statement "Yes" but for the second "No"
Explanation:
The athletic director tells a student that in return for staying in the team, that the team must submit to sexual advances. From the words in this statement, it is a purely sexual harassment as the director has conditioned the student , that he/she must submit to his sexual advances to stay in the team, which obviously from the statement, it can be understood that there must have been some form of rejection from the directors advances. definitely the school will be held liable for quid pro quo if discovered because it is involving a school official in a sexual harassment case.
Concerning the second statement, there can be some sort of mutual understanding between the students. It is refereed to has sexual relationship not sexual harassment Definitely, the school cant be help liable because it is between students not a school official
Answer:
religious economy
Explanation:
In simple words, Religious economy corresponds to spiritual individuals and organisations engaging with opposing communities and philosophies within a business system. An economy helps religious vendors to satisfy the needs of the numerous religious customers.
The theory of religious economics presents faith as a commodity, and as those that follow or associate as a customer of either faith. Yet as the notion of conviction is introduced into the calculation, the concept extends and the "good" is influenced by politics and who "absorbs" it.
The answer is: [C]: a large supply of cheap labor.
__________________________________________
Note: You meant to write:
__________________________________________
"Which factor HAD the greatest positive effect on the late 19th century American industrialization?"
__________________________________________
Answer:They wrote letters to Mexican officials asking for Austin’s release.
Explanation:Locals in Texas town supported Stephen Austin against his charges.Stephen Austin was a very impact revolutionist and he always wanted the independence of Texas.In the year 1834, in January when the government of Mexico thought that he was responsible for probing people against the government and the authority.
He got arrested and was behind the bars for eight months but there were no charges against him because no court was ready to take up his case because of the amount of support he was given by the people of Mexico.
