They dropped alligator carcasses on the bottom of the ocean floor as an experiment on a better understanding of the underwater food system! :) and this happened in 2020 Jan 11th
Answer:
Option D (Sedition Act) would be the correct approach.
Explanation:
- The above Sedition act, 1918, has been the statute that rendered opposing the administration another misdemeanor.
- Such utilization of some kind of mendacious, peculiar, as well as violent terminology, would be further forbidden. The statute also became concerned with several other punitive clauses.
The other alternative is not linked to something like the procedure outlined. So the alternative above is the right one.
A major event leading to the Russian Revolution took place on January 22, 1905. A Large number of workers were marching to the Tsar's palace in order to present a petition for better working conditions. They were fired upon by soldiers and many of them were killed or injured. This day is called Bloody Sunday.
Hoped I help! Mark me brainly if you can!♡
the answer here is 4..towns experienced more crimes
Answer:
What is the time relationship between a President’s assumption of office and his taking the oath? Apparently, the former comes first, this answer appearing to be the assumption of the language of the clause. The Second Congress assumed that President Washington took office on March 4, 1789,1 although he did not take the oath until the following April 30.
That the oath the President is required to take might be considered to add anything to the powers of the President, because of his obligation to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, might appear to be rather a fanciful idea. But in President Jackson’s message announcing his veto of the act renewing the Bank of the United States there is language which suggests that the President has the right to refuse to enforce both statutes and judicial decisions based on his own independent decision that they were unwarranted by the Constitution.2 The idea next turned up in a message by President Lincoln justifying his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus without obtaining congressional authorization.3 And counsel to President Johnson during his impeachment trial adverted to the theory, but only in passing.4 Beyond these isolated instances, it does not appear to be seriously contended that the oath adds anything to the President’s powers.
Topics
Elections and Voting Rights
Explanation:
