1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vaselesa [24]
3 years ago
6

Matt Company uses a standard cost system. Information for raw materials for Product RBI for the month of October follows: Standa

rd price per pound of raw materials $1.60 Actual purchase price per pound of raw materials $1.55 Actual quantity of raw materials purchased 2,000 pounds Actual quantity of raw materials used 1,900 pounds Standard quantity allowed for actual production 1,800 pounds What is the materials purchase price variance?
Business
1 answer:
Troyanec [42]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$100 favorable

Explanation:

The computation of the material purchase price variance is shown below:

= Actual Quantity purchased × (Standard Price - Actual Price)

= 2,000 pounds × ($1.60 - $1.55)

=  2,000 pounds × $0.05

= $100 favorable

Simply we took the difference between the standard and the actual price, and then multiply it by the actual quantity purchased

You might be interested in
On february 28th of 1986, _____________ starts her first solo world tour, starpeace, planning both u.s. and european dates. due
Monica [59]
Yoko Ono is the answer
5 0
4 years ago
Rebecca began taking
Naily [24]

Answer:

be more specific

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Label the following statements as True or False.
kumpel [21]

Answer:

1. All else equal, countries with more natural resources have a higher GDP per capita than those with few natural resources. - True

All else being equal (ceteris paribus), if a country is endowed with more natural resources, it will have a higher GDP per capita than a country with less natural resources, because it will be able to trade and transform those natural resources for a lower cost, allowing it to produce more goods and services.

2. Over the past two hundred years, improvements in productivity have offset lost productivity reduction due to less land being available. - True

This statement is true. In the modern-era, thanks to the green revolution, and other technological improvements, more food can be produced in less land. Many analysts coincide that if the green revolution had not come about, humanity would have been subject to permanent famine.

3. The key to prosperity in the 20th century is an economy rich in natural resources. - False

The key to prosperity in the 20th century is simply producing more goods and services, and human capital has been seen as a more important factor for this than natural resources. For example, countries that are poor in natural resources and are rich such as Japan and South Korea, are so because they have very well-educated populations that produce high quality goods and services.

4. Human and physical capital are only beneficial to an economy when there is an abundance of natural resources in the economy. - False

Human and physical capital can benefit an economy even in the absence of natural resources, because natural resources can be imported. Again, the example of Japan works because the island nation is poor in natural resources, but rich in human capital, and not so deprived of physical capital, and has managed to become a developed nation by highly compex finished goods for natural resources.

6 0
3 years ago
The most likely effect of a write-down of inventory to net realizable on a firm's total asset turnover is:
Y_Kistochka [10]
<span>The most likely effect of a write-down of inventory to net realizable on a firm's total asset turnover is an increase.

</span>A write-down of inventory to net realizable value is typically recognized as an increase in cost of goods sold in the period of the write-down, according the <span>inventory equation:
</span><span>ending inv</span>entory = beginning inventory + purchases - cost of goods sold
7 0
3 years ago
The Baldwin Company has just purchased $40,900,000 of plant and equipment that has an estimated useful life of 15 years. The exp
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

b. $4,908,000

Explanation:

According to the FASB GAAP, the straight line method is used in this given question which is shown below:

= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)

= ($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ (15 years)

= ($36,810,000) ÷ (15 years)  

= $2,454,000

In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life

For two years, the accumulated depreciation would be

= Annual year depreciation × number of years

= $2,454,000 × 2 years

= $4,908,000

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Although she hates the work, Jessica has spent most weekends and the last three summers as a short-order cook; she has an associ
    15·2 answers
  • Parent Inc. purchased 30% of the common stock of Affiliate Co. on January 1, YR01 for $5,000 and appropriately accounted for thi
    15·1 answer
  • Davidson Software Technologies believes in hiring only the best programmers in the industry. As a result, it uses a comprehensiv
    8·1 answer
  • Saint Petersburg Gambles - You are offered the following gamble based on coin flips. If the first heads occurs on the first flip
    6·1 answer
  • An increase in savings __________.A. provides more funds for investment
    11·1 answer
  • Emphasis on product, sales-volume-oriented, needs of seller Customer wants, profit-oriented, future growth Sales-volume-oriented
    15·1 answer
  • Mike receives a payroll check from National Computer Systems, Inc., and indorses it by signing his name on the back of the check
    12·1 answer
  • When experts and journalists spend so much time talking about the limitations of education, they almost certainly are discouragi
    11·2 answers
  • Though managers commonly deal with negative individual behaviors, which behavior is more rare and more serious to address
    10·1 answer
  • a perpetual bond with a par value of $1,000 and a semiannual coupon has a yield to maturity of 5.20% and a current price of $1,0
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!