Answer:
ex post facto law
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Bob seems to be the victim of an ex post facto law. This is a type of law that changes the legal consequences that were put into effect in the past, before this new law was introduced. Which is why Bob is being arrested even though at the time of purchasing the beer, he was doing it legally.
Producers. Government subsidies are paid to the producer of the product being subsidized. A good example of this is the farm subsidy program in the U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/07/02/GR2006070200024.html
Farmers (producers) are directly paid by the government to grow certain desired crops. Other groups like importers and exporters may benefit from subsidies but the key words in the question are "directly benefits." In other words, who is it receiving the subsidy money from the provider of the subsidy? The producer did.
Answer:
social exchange
Explanation:
social exchange
The concept of social exchange implies that social behaviour stems from the process of exchange This trade of exchange is aimed at optimising benefits and reducing costs. As per this theory Individuals consume the potential advantage and risks of social relations When the threats outweigh the benefits, this partnership is terminated or abandoned by individuals.
B) The defendant is hospitalized, I think.
Answer:
California state government provides law and order.
Explanation: California government provides, law and order, police protection, courts, public education, roads, fire protection, utilities, flood prevention, health and safety regulations and state parks.