Answer:
It is better to cleaned and shipped to the firm's outlet center at a cost of $23,000 to be sold at $80,000
Explanation: In alternative A) the firm loss is $80,000 ($125,000-$45,000)
In alternative E) all $125,000 is lost
In alternative B, C and D) the loss is $68,000 ($125,000-$80,000+$23,000)
Relevant costs are those evitable, that are cause of a manager decision related to an specific business decision.
The only cost that can be avoided in these example is the cost of $23,000 so the goods can be cleaned and shipped to the firm's outlet center
Answer:
the operating cash flow is $365
Explanation:
the computation of the operating cash flow is shown below:
operating cash flow is
= Net income + depreciation expense
= $245 + $120
= $365
hence, the operating cash flow is $365
We simply added the net income and the depreciation expense to determine the operating cash flow
<u>Explanation:</u>
1. As in the case of Certain-Tees, Inc., their approach follows The Fairness or Justice ethical framework. This ethical framework involves the basic belief that everyone or everything should be treated or done fairly.
2. As in the case of Sahara, Inc., and Perfect Paper executives, their approach follows the Utilitarian ethical framework. Which is the belief in doing what brings the greatest or most good to the majority.
3. As in the case of Positron Auto Parts, their approach follows The Common Good ethical framework, which relies heavily on cultural aspects to define ethical practices.
Answer:
In the context of the external environment of an organization, the task environment: includes the sectors that conduct day-to-day transactions with the organization.
Explanation:
In an organization setting, what is tagged as external environment entails the sectors that transacts with the organization on a day-to-day routine. Their forms of relationship on daily basis makes them to serve as external environment, they could be clients as the case may be.
Answer:
D) 137000 39000
Explanation:
Allen 140,000
Daniel 40,000
Capital before admission 180,000
share ratio 3:1
Capital after admission:
180,000 + 40,000 = 220,000
David participation: 20%
220,000 x 20% = 44,000
David investment 40,000
goodwill: 4,000
There is a difference in goodwill which will be supported for the old partner as their current share ratio
Allen 4,000 x 3/4 = 3,000
Daniel 4,000 x 1/4 = 1,000
Capital after David admission:
140,000 - 3,000 = 137,000
40,000 - 1,000 = 39,000
