Answer:
I don't think he got any back
Explanation:
The money could have been a tip.
Answer:
Explanation:
a. A temporary increase in government purchases would result in a reduction in savings, which would, in turn, lead to the implementation of higher taxes by the government so as to match prices and wages.
This would: make output to remain unchanged, real interest to increase and current price level to increase as well.
b. A reduction in expected inflation would lead to an increment in the demand for real money, as people do not expect inflation to increase for a while. Thus, more demand creates a reduction in the price level. Everything else remains unchanged. This would: make output remain unchanged, real interest remain unchanged and the current price level to decrease.
C. A temporary increase in labor supply would make more people have jobs and therefore more people can save. If more people save the interest rates are liable to decrease therefore money demand will increase. This would: make output to increase, real interest to decline and current price level to decrease.
d. An increase in the interest rate paid on money will lead to a higher demand for money. With an unchanged nominal money supply and higher money demand, the price would decline but everything remains unchanged. This would make: output remain unchanged, real interest remains unchanged and the current price level decrease.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
Answer:
Dividend yield is 2.91 %.
Explanation:
Dividend yield = Annual Dividend per Share / Stock Price per Share × 100
<em>where,</em>
Annual Dividend per Share = Total Dividends ÷ Total Number of Shares
= $835 ÷ 500
= $1.67
<em>then,</em>
Dividend yield = $1.67 / $57.48 × 100
= 2.905 or 2.91 %
Answer:
Option A is the correct answer,no adjustment is needed.
Explanation:
When related companies sell to each other,the sales transaction is not sales in actual sense,as it is likened to the left hand of an individual exchanging cash with the right hand,in other words, the cash is still owned by the same person.
The same concept is applicable to subsidiaries and parent,the sales recorded from a group perspective is when they sold to external third parties.
When sales happen between related companies, a provision for unrealized profits has to be made to the tune of inventory purchased from related companies not yet sold externally,as the whole of the goods have been to third parties, no such provision or adjustment is required.
