The answer is b.<span>
Learning a skill without being aware that you've learned it
is known as implicit learning. Implicit learning is a kind of learning including difficult information
without the person being aware or happened in incidentally. This happened
the person involved is unaware that he/she has learned something.</span>
Answer:
block organization
Explanation:
Block organization is a term that refers to the structuring of a paragraph, or text, that allows the approach to various subjects or various ideas in an organized way and ensuring that information is passed on clearly and comprehensibly to the reader. . An example of Block Organization is the example given in the question, where a paragraph contrasting two teachers, in this paragraph the first half focuses on Chavez and the second half focuses on that Mr. Munn
Third World countries were involved in the following events during the Cold War:
British Petroleum's loss of control of its oil production
Correct label: <u>Iran</u>
The Suez Canal Crisis involving Great Britain, France, and Israel
Correct label: <u>Egypt</u>
The United Fruit Company's nationalization
Correct label: <u>Guatemala</u>
"Nationalized the Suez Canal, jointly owned by Britain and France. Oil Company, whose refinery in Iran was Britain's largest remaining overseas asset."
<u>Explanation</u>:
The nations that are not aligned with either First World or Second World are known as Third World. The developing countries are referred as the Third World. Asia, Africa, and Latin America are some of the countries of Third World.
Cold War was actually a war with restricted rivalry after World War II. Cold war was between the countries with superpower. The Cold War is named so, as there was no usage of nuclear weapons and the countries did not fight with each other directly.
Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
