Answer:
The answer is True.
Explanation:
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer legal liabilities caused by a wrongful act committed. If Bill did nothing wrong and he is being accused by the store of theft and he did nothing wrong. He can put the store in court because of emotional distress and negligence. <u>In this case, the answer is True and the store is committing a tortious act</u>.
I believe the answer is: It would be narrow
Judicial restraint is the view that encourages encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. This would force the judge to interpret the constitution limited to only things that explicitly written in the constitution, without any chance to make adjustment to changing norms or technology.
Im pretty sure the answer is false. hope this helps!
Answer:
the answer could be ARTICLE V(article 5)
Explanation:
i took a test on it
