All categories

3 years ago

If someone runs a red light in front of you, and you choose NOT to slow

Business

2 answers:

borishaifa [10]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: Letter B, aka “be partially at fault if there’s a collision.

Explanation: Why is it partially your fault instead of wholly your fault or not your fault at all? Well, it’s also the person who ran the red light’s fault. Why? There’s a reason on why red lights even exist. They exist to prevent any accidents, such as collisions, meaning, it’s also the other person’s fault. Why are you at fault though? Simple! You should have slowed down immediately after noticing the person ran the red light.

Hope this helped! <3

mezya [45]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

A. "Not be at fault if there is a collision". Normally when someone runs a red light you don't have enough time to swerve or slow down and you might just collide with them but it's not your fault. The person who ran the red light would be at fault.

You might be interested in

True or False: Reducing trade restrictions, thereby increasing access to more economical foreign goods, would increase the prosp

Zolol [24]

The answer is true. because if the government allow trades to take place people would be able to exchange goods from countries to countries.

6 0

4 years ago

Assume Lavender Corporation has a market value of $4 billion of equity and a market value of $19.8 billion of debt. What are the

harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Debt = 83.19%

Equity = 16.81%

Explanation:

Given that

Market value of the equity = $4 billion

Market value of debt = $19.8 billion

Total firm capital would be

= Market value of the equity + Market value of the debt

= $4 billion + $19.8 billion

= $23.8 billion

So, the weightage of debt would be

= Market value of debt ÷ Total firm capital

= $19.8 billion ÷ $23.8 billion

= 83.19%

And, the weightage of equity is

= Market value of equity ÷ Total firm capital

= $4 billion ÷ $23.8 billion

= 16.81%

5 0

3 years ago

Please show all work in excelGreat Lakes Shipping is an all-equity firm with anticipated earnings before interest and taxes of $

padilas [110]

Answer:

$2,163,171

Explanation:

We use the MM model with taxes to evaluate a firm with financial leverage

$V_l = V_u + t \times D\\$Where:\\V_l = $value of the levered firm\\Vu = value of unlevered firm\\D = debt of thee firm\\t = tax rate$

D x t = 1,250,000 x 0.36 = 450,000

<u />

<u>Now we calcualte the value of the firm without financial leverage:</u>

The unlevered firm will produce 439,000

It pays taxes for 36% and no interest expense so his net income will be

439,000 x ( 1 - 0.36) = 280,96‬0

then we calculate using the cost of equity the value of the firm usng the perpetuity formula:

280,960/.164 = 1,713,170.73 = 1,713,171

Now we add the debt tax shield to calculate the firm value with leverage

1,713,171 + 450,000 = 2,163,171

6 0

3 years ago

3. You own a portfolio that has $4,740 invested in Stock A and $3,260 invested in Stock B. If the expected returns on these stoc

Alina [70]

Answer:

Portfolio expected return = 0.092225 or 9.2225%

Explanation:

The expected portfolio return is a function of the weighted average of the individual stocks' returns that form up the portfolio. The expected return on the portfolio containing two stocks can be calculated as follows,

Portfolio Expected Return = wA * rA + wB * rB

Where,

w represents the weight of stocks
r represents the return from each stock

To calculate the weight of each stock in the portfolio, we first need to calculate the total investment in the portfolio.

Total Investment = 4740 + 3260 = 8000

Portfolio expected return = 4740/8000 * 8% + 3260/8000 * 11%

Portfolio expected return = 0.092225 or 9.2225%

6 0

3 years ago

For a certain firm, the 100th unit of output that the firm produces has a marginal revenue of $10 and a marginal cost of $7. It

sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

The answer is A. the production of the 100th unit of output increases the firm's profit by $3

Explanation:

ans is Production of the 100th unit of output increases the firm's profit by $3.

4 0

3 years ago