We have freedom of speech to say what we would like too. But if it degrades out higher power’s then it’s technically against the law. For social justice we can only say proven facts, anything else can we classified as a act of terrorism if we speak out again the government. Exp. Dr. Martin Luther King.
Answer:
I would say sequence
Explanation:
The reason would be that it would be in order from the beginning to the end but it could also be timeline but that probably wouldn’t make sense.
The two-state solution is an idea that Israel and Palestine would live next to each other with secure borders and respectful of each other. The idea is noble and surely better than the situation that exists nowadays, however the prospect of success depends on their willingness to stick to a two-state plan that would be devised. It would be possible for a two-state solution to exist with the help of an international union like the UN to help enforce the idea of two-states.
They saw the laws as unlawful according to the 14th amendment. The blacks needed equal rights with the whites. You might want to double check the amendment number but im pretty sure its the 14th.
Anything related to: that the only right people give up in order to enter into civil society and its benefits is the right to punish other people for violating rights. No other rights are given up, only the right to be a vigilante