1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irakobra [83]
3 years ago
5

Is it possible for the U.S. to not only stay out of European affairs, but also the affairs of all other countries today? Explain

and defend your opinion. (Do not focus your answer on trade.)
History
1 answer:
vivado [14]3 years ago
8 0
Today it is not possible. Since you can't talk about trade, you can talk about culture. The United States are a major export of culture throughout the world, which includes things like movies, music, books, and similar. These works of art often depict traits of the American culture and they are appealing to numerous people worldwide. Even if the US wanted to end all connections to Europeans and other countries worldwide, the culture would still carry on and keep spreading because people worldwide want it to spread.
You might be interested in
What type of scientist would study the nature of government?
Sloan [31]
I think it’s just government scientist
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe how an atlatl was useful to early people in the southwest.
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

<h2><em>Atlatls give additional velocity and thrust compared to spear-throwing, and they allow the hunter to stand farther away from the prey. They are called atlatls, because that's what the Aztecs were calling them when the Spanish arrived.</em></h2>
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After World War II, the United States relationship with the USSR began to break down over ideals related to communism. Choose AL
Marianna [84]

Answer:

C, and E

Explanation:

C and E are definite answers and A and B are definitely not. I suspect D isn't either but in one phase of the Korean war UN troops which were largely American pushed the North Koreans back across their own border. However I would stick with C and E.

7 0
3 years ago
The president is managing a war that is not going well. nevertheless, he refuses to withdraw troops, arguing that doing so would
barxatty [35]
The line of reasoning illustrates the<span> sunk-cost fallacy.

Basically, the money and lives in the war were already invested. The idea behind it is that if you leave the war then it will all be in vain. Since it was already invested, then there's no reason to leave the war since the costs have to be returned and his idea would be that by staying in the war you might win and then have the benefits that outdo the costs.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
How did hitler use propaganda on Germany
alekssr [168]

Answer:

To make their soldiers scared of him or to join him

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Arguing against the nativist position in 1852, a massachusetts senator argued that the __________.
    9·1 answer
  • Why we should learn about Erik Thorvaldsson (Erik the red ) now? What is his significance to modern day society?
    9·1 answer
  • At the Battle of Gettysburg, General Robert E. Lee surrendered his army and supplies to General George Meade. captured control o
    11·1 answer
  • In history "era" is often used to label a period of time associated with one ruler or ruling family
    9·2 answers
  • What was Truman's response to Joseph McCarthy
    13·1 answer
  • Various monuments constructed in pakistan show their grandeur but nowadays they are being affected by many external factors. Ide
    6·1 answer
  • Copy the words that give Americans the right not to incriminate themselves.
    10·1 answer
  • How did Lincoln’s intentions in relation to slavery change from the beginning of the war to the end?
    7·1 answer
  • Who introduced the Bill of Rights to the Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • HELP!!! 6 POINTS!!!
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!