Answer:
intimate terrorism
Explanation:
An intimate terrorism can be referred to as the presence of physical assault by a relationship partner; the partners could be a current partner or an ex partner.
The physical assault is in such a way that varieties of tactics are used to maintain control over the other person in the relationship
As mentioned earlier, intimate terrorism involved physical assaults and it can assume any of the following forms; it could be physical, verbal, emotional, economic and sexual abuse.
Answer:
The possible excuse in defense of the adolescent could be the kleptomania condition. It is a neurological condition which is characterized by recurrent episodes of compulsive steal.
Explanation:
As the options are not included with this question, we cannot chose a particular statement. Nevertheless, we are able to explain what the Supreme Court has ruled when it comes to the constitutional requirements of confinement.
The first case that addressed such conditions was that of <em>Holt v. Sarver</em>, in 1970. This was the first in a series of common law cases that found state prison systems to violate the Eighth Amendment. This amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment.
This series of cases established that confinement should not include the unnecessary infliction of pain, nor should conditions be grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime warranting imprisonment. The restrictions placed on prisoners can be restrictive, and even harsh, but should not become cruel. This includes the display of deliberate indifference in emergencies on the part of officials, or malicious and sadistic acts.
Answer:
I d k I don't know got it? sorry
