Answer:
D: They were portrayed as being in thought or studying books
Explanation:
Answer:
dear friend,
how is every thing going? how are your parents? hope they are doing well i just read .your letter about what u learned from the life of Florence Nightingale and Mahatma Gandhi.so i thought why not write what i have learned from the life of Florence Nightingale and Mahatma Gandhi.
i have learned that One of Nightingale's most important innovations was her emphasis on hospital cleanliness and sanitation. Her famous “Notes on Nursing,” first published in 1859, devotes several sections to cleanliness and patient environment. When she first began her career, many hospitals were filthy. and many more things but i will just end this letter here and write more next time
hope you liked the letter please write back soon
regards ,your friend ,your best friend
your name
Explanation:
People who held the pen in their teeth thought the cartoons were funnier, while people who held the pen in their lips though the cartoons were less funny.
<h3 /><h3>How physiology influences emotions</h3>
We know, for example, that once we feel happy we smile. Therefore, happiness is the cause of the smile. However, experiments and studies have shown that the opposite is also true: If you smile, you feel happy. In this case, the smile is the cause of happiness.
That is proof that physiology influences human emotions. In the experiment described in the question, the people holding the pen in their teeth rated the cartoons as funnier because they were smiling. That is, holding the pen in their teeth contracted their muscles in a way similar to smiling, which made them happier.
On the other hand, those who were holding the pen with their lips ended up with a facial expression that did not resemble a smile at all. For that reason, they rated the cartoons as less funny.
Learn more about physiology and emotions here:
brainly.com/question/13161933
#SPJ12
Ottoman Empire: 3
Holocaust: 4
Zionism: 2
Anti-Semitism: 1
Answer:Arjuna feels it is sin to kill anyone or she'd blood for the kingdom that he doesn't even wants from the first place .
Krishna believes this is not real killing someone because a person doesn't even die he just get separated from the body as the body dies and the soul is released to face their karma.
Krishna convinces Arjuna that this is just preparation for karma.
I feel more comfortable with Arjuna why kill for the Kingdom that you don't even desired from the first place .
Taking a soul is rather a harsh way of getting things done nomatter what the reason may be .
I stand with the right to life .
Explanation: