I think the answer is B, but I am not sure.
Answer and Explanation:
The matching is as follows
1. In the absorption costing, the gross profit is on the income statement
2. The variable cost provided the useful report with respect for controlling cost
3. The fixed selling cost be the period cost in both the absorption & variable costing
4. In absorption costing, it required by GAAP
In this way it should be matched
hence, the same would be relevant and considered
Answer:
$255,000
Explanation:
Given that,
2016:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 30%
2017:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 35%
Income tax refund receivable in 2018:
= Taxable and pretax financial loss in 2018 × Tax rate in the year 2016
= $850,000 × 30 percent
= $255,000
Note:
(i) The carry back provision allows losses to be carried back to preceding 2 years, with the amount of net loss being applied to earliest year first.
(ii) 2018 net loss should be applied to income of 2016 first.
Answer: Well, first this relies on whether or not a pack plants twelve plants or just one. For the sake of this question, I will assume they plant one. Each plant costs two dollars and fifty cents to plant, and each are sold for five dollars, making two dollars and fifty cents profit on each. 12 times 2.5 is thirty dollars of profit total.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is the option: True.
Explanation:
First of all, the<em> Australian Prudential Regulation Authority</em> or APRA is the name given to an independent statutory authority whose main purpose is to regulate and supervise institutions across banking, insurance and superannuation and promotes financial system stability in Australia.
Secondly, <em>authorized deposit-taking institutions</em> are those financial institutions that are permitted to accept deposits from the public in Australia and <u>all financial intermediaries that are registered are authorized to carry out financial intermediation</u>.
