Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
The primary weakness of this passage is:
- D, The passage fails to make a debatable claim
<h3>What is a Debatable Claim?</h3>
A debatable claim is a thought or primary message that is arguable. A debatable claim has strong language that shows the certainty of the speaker.
The claim made in the above text is weak because it gives no room for strong academic debate.
Learn more about debatable claims here:
brainly.com/question/21661776
#SPJ1
Answer:
This is a completely personal question that you need to answer with your own weaknesses. But anyway I will give you examples so that you can understand the question and can formulate your own answer.
Explanation:
Communication is the voluntary act of transmitting information between living beings. Communication is related to all living beings, in one way or another, with various purposes and strategies, whether they are microorganisms exchanging chemical signals, birds exchanging songs or human beings exchanging pieces of language.
Not all people have the same communication skills. Some may have their weakest points such as:
- Shame of public speaking
- Lack of language
- Lack of body expression
- Low level of written and oral communication
- There are people who find it difficult to deal with others
All of these language practices can be improved. If you think you need to improve any of these, or even have some other technique that you want to improve, that will serve as an answer.
The voices or speakers used by authors when they seemingly speak for themselves in a book. The use of this term makes it
clear in critical discussion that the narration or presentation of a story is not necessarily to be identified with the biographical
and historical author. Instead, the authorial voice may be another fiction created by the author. It is often considered poor
form for a modern literary critic to equate the authorial voice with the historical author, but this practice was common in the
nineteenth century. In fact, it is naive to assume that the authorial voice is a "real" representation of the historical author.
The answer is A. Therefore
