In inductive reasoning, the premises are seen as supplying strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The conclusion is definite, but the truth may be probable, based on the available evidence. So she might say, that based on the past history of the company involved, whenever the company is losing money for a given length of time, there are layoffs, so in these similar circumstances it is probable that these planned layoffs will occur.
Answer:
Inventar (no copiar de internet) un microcuento fantástico con alguno de los siguientes hechos sobrenaturales o inverosímiles: fantasmas, transformaciones, poderes increíbles, etc.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the extra satisfaction gained from consuming one more unit of a good.
Answer:
NPV = 138,347.55
Explanation:
<em>Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project.</em>
We sahall compute theNPV of this project by discounting the appropriate cash flows as follows:
<em>Prevent Value of operating cash flow</em>
PV =A× (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
A- 23,900, r - 12%, n- 5
PV = $23,900 × (1- (1.12)^(-5))/0.05
=206,769.963
<em>PV of Working Capital recouped</em>
PV = 5600× 1.12^(-5)
= 3,177.59
NPV = initial cost + working capital + Present Value of working capital recouped + PV of operating cash inflow
NPV = (66,000) + (5600) + 3,177.59 + 206,769.96
NPV = 138,347.55
