"Accountability" in journalism: Journalism businesses typically apprehend this principle of duty through admitting mistakes and correcting them promptly, as referred to in SPJ's Code of Ethics. most additionally submit complaints in their news efforts contained in letters to the editor.
The definition of accountability is taking or being assigned duty for something that you have executed or something you're presupposed to do. An example of responsibility is when a worker admits mistakes she made on a challenge.
Accountability, in phrases of ethics and governance, is equated with answerability, blameworthiness, legal responsibility, and the expectancy of account-giving. As in a thing of governance, it's been central to discussions related to problems in the public quarter, nonprofit, and personal and personal contexts. duty is a guarantee that a man or woman or an agency could be evaluated on their performance or behavior associated with something for which they're responsible. The term is associated with obligation but is seen as greater from the attitude of oversight.
Learn more about Accountability here:
brainly.com/question/980342
#SPJ4
If you are in a car accident cause by someone else who also has insurance, the type of insurance plan that will not require you to pay out of pocket costs is liability insurance. If the car accident was not your fault and the person who caused the accident is also insured the claim should be paid by him under his coverage and your pocket will be safe as well as your insurance will not be affected.
Answer:
The correct answer is that: informants are difficult to control and the police can not trust in them always.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the police officer finds out that the informant went behind his back and purchase drug then the officer must understand that the informant is not trustful and moreover<u> he could mean a risk to the whole undercover operation</u> that the police officer is managing, therefore that the scenario is propounding that situations like that exemplify that informants can not be trusted due to the fact that they are ex convicted and that is why the officers have to be carefull when working with them.
This answer requires that we fill in the blanks. The answers are contained in the bullet to fill the missing places
- shareholder wealth
- larger the NPV
- higher stock price.
- WACC
- accept the project.
- higher positive NPV.
<h3>What is the NPV?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the net present value. This is the value that is calculated as the difference between the cash inflows and out flows for over a time period.
In order to get the NPV we have to make the following calculations for the projects A and B.
We have:
<u>For Project A</u>
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= $355. 237
<u> project B</u>
we would have
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= 378.98
The value for the project B happens to be greater than that of A hence this is the value that we have to accept
Read more on NPV here:
brainly.com/question/17185385
#SPJ1
Answer: The tax on capital gains is deferred until the gain is realized
Explanation:
The TAX DIFFERENTIAL VIEW of DIVIDEND POLICY is a notion that states that shareholders generally prefer capital gains fo dividend payouts because capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than dividend payouts.
Therefore they would like to pay less tax on dividends and instead wait until they make a capital gain as the taxes on that are less and are only charged after the gain is realized.
This translates to less dividends being paid by companies that follow this logic therefore the 4th option is correct.
