Answer:
Deforestation, and especially the destruction of rainforests, is a hugely significant contributor to climate change. Scientists estimate that forest loss and other changes to the use of land account for around 23% of current man-made CO2 emissions – which equates to 17% of the 100-year warming impact of all current greenhouse-gas emissions.
As children are taught at school, trees and other plants absorb CO2 from the air as they grow. Using energy from the sun, they turn the carbon captured from the CO2 molecules into building blocks for their trunks, branches and foliage. This is all part of the carbon cycle.
A mature forest doesn't necessarily absorb much more CO2 that it releases, however, because when each tree dies and either rots down or is burned, much of its stored carbon is released once again. In other words, in the context of climate change, the most important thing about mature forests is not that they reduce the amount of CO2 in the air but that they are huge reservoirs of stored carbon. If such a forest is burned or cleared then much of that carbon is released back into the atmosphere, adding to atmospheric CO2 levels.
Of course, the same process also works in reverse. If trees are planted where previously there weren't any, they will on soak up CO2 as they grow, reducing the amount of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. It is thought that trees, plants and other land-based "carbon sinks" currently soak up more than a quarter of all the CO2 that humans add to the air each year – though that figure could change as the planet warms.
Unsurprisingly, the relationship between trees and local and global temperature is more complicated than the simple question of the greenhouse gases they absorb and emit. Forests have a major impact on local weather systems and can also affect the amount of sunlight absorbed by the planet: a new area of trees in a snowy region may create more warming than cooling overall by darkening the land surface and reducing the amount of sunlight reflected back to space.
Explanation:
Answer: Umm... I'm not too sure if this is a news article, but I think this might be able to help... Its from AJPH and their article is called, "Positive and Negative Influences of Religion, Culture, and Tradition in Public Health". It was published in March of 2019. All rights and everything go to them. I hope this helps.
Answer: Syntax
Explanation:
The options are:
a. Phonology
b. Morphology
c. Syntax
d. Semantics
• Phonology is how sound patterns are being studied.
• Morphology is how words are being studied and formed, and it also shows the relationship that exists between the words formed and other words. Here, word structure such as prefixes, suffixes and root words are analysed.
• Semantics is the meaning phrases and words.
• Syntax has to do with how words are arranged in order to form sentences.
Since it was reported that Koko can use 1000 different signs, and can understand 2000 words and that Koko is now creating statements by blending three to six words, the highest level that the animal may have attained is referred to as syntax.
Since according to the question, Koko can now use words to form sentences, it means Koko has attained syntax stage.
According to Erik Erikson’s psychosocial development stages, adolescents are in the stage of "Identity vs. Role Confusion". Ages between 13-19 years would usually question their identity and what will they become, and strongly affected by peers with their most important virtue which is fidelity.
Answer:
Spelling.
Explanation:
It's really about language and the evolution of tongues, but when I say tongues, I mean dialects, since they both mean the same thing: Praise God.
