1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following measures how many people can read and write?

History
2 answers:
harkovskaia [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D.) Literacy :))))))))))

-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Literacy is the ability to read and write.

You might be interested in
According to one major language theory, how did different groups develop their own languages?
dedylja [7]
According to one major language theory, how did different groups develop their own languages?

Answer: There are two main theories that explain how different groups developed their own languages. The major one is that humans at some point in time evolved a language acquisition device.

I hope it helps, Regards.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the significance of Grant’s meeting Lee at the Appomattox Courthouse. please
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

HE GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT

See "The Surrender" painting by Keith Rocco

On the morning of April 9, while General Robert E . Lee realized that the retreat of his beleaguered army had finally been halted, U. S. Grant was riding toward Appomattox Court House where Union Cavalry, followed by infantry from the V, XXIV, and XXV Corps had blocked the Confederate path. Lee had sent a letter to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss his army's surrender and this letter overtook Grant and his party just before noon about four miles west of Walker's Church (present-day Hixburg). Grant, who had been suffering from a severe headache, later remembered that upon reading Lee's letter the pain in his head had disappeared. He stopped to prepare his reply to Lee, writing that he would push to the front to meet him.

The location of the meeting was left to Lee's discretion. Lt. Colonel Orville E . Babcock and his orderly, Capt. Dunn, took Grant's reply and rode ahead. Babcock found Lee resting under an apple tree near the Appomattox River. After reading Grant's letter, Lee, his Aide-de-Camp Lt. Colonel Charles Marshall, and Private Joshua O. Johns rode toward Appomattox Court House accompanied by Federal Officers Lt. Col. Babcock and Capt. William McKee Dunn. Marshall and Johns rode ahead of Lee in order to find a place for the generals to confer. As Marshall passed through the village he saw Wilmer McLean in the vicinity of the courthouse. He asked McLean if he knew of a suitable location, and McLean took him to an empty structure that was without furniture. Marshall immediately rejected this offer. Then McLean offered his own home. After seeing the comfortable country abode, Marshall readily accepted and sent Private Johns back to inform General Lee that a meeting site had been found.

Lee arrived at the McLean house about one o'clock and took a seat in the parlor. A half hour later, the sound of horses on the stage road signalled the approach of General Grant. Entering the house, Grant greeted Lee in the center of the room. The generals presented a contrasting appearance; Lee in a new uniform and Grant in his mud-spattered field uniform. Grant, who remembered meeting Lee once during the Mexican War, asked the Confederate general if he recalled their meeting. Lee replied that he did, and the two conversed in a very cordial manner, for approximately 25 minutes. The subject had not yet gotten around to surrender until finally, Lee, feeling the anguish of defeat, brought Grant's attention to it. Grant, who later confessed to being embarrassed at having to ask for the surrender from Lee, said simply that the terms would be just as he had outlined them in a previous letter.

The terms would parole officers and enlisted men but required that all Confederate military equipment be relinquished. The discussion between the generals then drifted into the prospects for peace, but Lee, once again taking the lead, asked Grant to put his terms in writing. When Grant finished, he handed the terms to his former adversary, and Lee -- first donning spectacles used for reading-- quietly looked them over. When he finished reading, the bespectacled Lee looked up at Grant and remarked "This will have a very happy effect on my army." Lee asked if the terms allowed his men to keep their horses, for in the Confederate army men owned their mounts. Lee explained that his men would need these animals to farm once they returned to civilian life. Grant responded that he would not change the terms as written (which had no provisions allowing private soldiers to keep their mounts) but would order his officers to allow any Confederate claiming a horse or a mule to keep it. General Lee agreed that this concession would go a long way toward promoting healing. Grant's generosity extended further. When Lee mentioned that his men had been without rations for several days, the Union commander arranged for 25, 000 rations to be sent to the hungry Confederates. After formal copies of the surrender terms, and Lee's acceptance, had been drafted and exchanged, the meeting ended.

In a war that was marked by such divisiveness and bitter fighting, it is remarkable that it ended so simply. Grant's compassion and generosity did much to allay the emotions of the Confederate troops. As for Robert E. Lee, he realized that the best course was for his men to return home and resume their lives as American citizens.

Before he met with General Grant, one of Lee's officers (General E. Porter Alexander) had suggested fighting a guerilla war, but Lee had rejected the idea. It would only cause more pain and suffering for a cause that was lost. The character of both Lee and Grant was of such a high order that the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia has been called "The Gentlemen's Agreement."

7 0
3 years ago
Who was the French lord who led one of the First Crusades?
sladkih [1.3K]
Hello there, I am Steel42 and I am willing to help :)

The First crusades was led by many French Lords, but one that we are familiar with is, <span>Godfrey of Bouillon, a </span> Frankish knight, and one of the leaders of the First Crusade from 1096 until his death. They were also led by many dukes, some that is not named in history.


Hope this helps : )
6 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST AND 15 POINTS!HURRY PLZ!
Helga [31]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

maybe im not sure sorry

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best compares slavery and sharecropping?
dexar [7]

Sharecroppers were free people and slaves weren't. Slaves didn't "rent" a piece of someone's land and work on it. They were forced to work on land since they were owned by the land owner.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Person sent by the Church to convert Native Americans to Christianity?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the best definition of realpolitik?
    12·2 answers
  • From the time of reconstruction until the 1970s, the democratic party in texas had very little competition. many claim that the
    7·1 answer
  • How did local laws throughout the south degrade african american
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes city life during the Han dynasty?
    10·2 answers
  • For whom was the battle of Trenton a victory?<br><br> (A) the Americans<br> (B) the British
    11·2 answers
  • Who were the aristocrats of early Rome?
    6·1 answer
  • This map shows the boundaries of a West African empire that used trade to become wealthy and powerful. What is the name of this
    13·1 answer
  • During the 1960s, how did the mural movement promote the Chicano Movement?
    8·2 answers
  • PLS HELP NOW!! THIS IS DUE IN 10 MINS
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!