Answer:
imaginary audience
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Mary's behavior exhibits imaginary audience. This term refers to when an individual imagines and believed that people are all focused on him/her. Which is what is happening to Mary when she believes everyone is staring and talking about her pimple. This is a very common state among adolescents.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Answer is Option B: it is harder to manipulate mental images than perceptual images.
Explanation:
Mental imagery means pictures in the mind or what one is visualizing. Mental imagery is caused by mental images in the mind of a person. But it is different from perceptual images (images from perception) because mental images occur when there is no external stimuli.
Images from perception are a result of some external stimuli. So, Option B is the most apt answer from the given options. Both do not share same brain mechanisms as per option A. Nor Imagery is more stable than perception as per option C. Imagery doesn't occur automatically as per option D.
Answer:
Correct answer is option d. increased real returns to capital in France and increased real wages in Italy.
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model demonstrates that the comparative advantage is determined by the interaction between a country's resources, the relative abundance of production factors, and technology. It is the interaction between abundance and intensity with which these resources are exploited the source of comparative advantages.
Answer:
primary productivity is the rate at which biomass is produced
Explanation:
I got it right
<span>The closest to perfection would be an interdependent Confederation of societies, each containing between one and two hundred citizens, depending upon factors such as location and climate. These villages would be more or less evenly distributed across the globe, having access to roughly equivalent amounts of arable land. Thirty per cent of all land would be designated wilderness, and no societies would be allowed to colonise these areas, but antisocial individuals would be free to inhabit the wilderness following a life-style of total lonesomeness.</span>