1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
HACTEHA [7]
3 years ago
5

Anybody know this answer

Mathematics
1 answer:
katrin [286]3 years ago
3 0

It shows three periods of a sin graph

You might be interested in
X-3y=-15 standard form to slope-intercept form
jeyben [28]
The answer I got is y= 1/3x + 5
7 0
3 years ago
A kite is stuck in a 36-ft tree. If the angle of elevation from the kite and the ground is 12, find the length of the kite.
yanalaym [24]

Answer:

173.15 ft.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Please find the attachment.

Let L be the length of kite.  

We have been given that a kite is stuck in  36-ft tree. The angle of elevation from the kite and the ground is 12.

We can see from our attachment that kite and tree form a right triangle. height of tree is opposite of angle of elevation and length of kite is hypotenuse.

Since we know that Sine relates the opposite and hypotenuse of a right triangle, so we will use sine to find the length of kite.

sin(12)=\frac{36}{L}    

L=\frac{36}{sin(12)}

L=\frac{36}{0.207911690818}  

L=173.1504364105882792\approx 173.15

Therefore, the length of kite is 173.15 ft.

4 0
3 years ago
This makes no sense, I don’t understand
julsineya [31]

Answer:

the range where we see the function is between x=0 and x=7

its B

A is impossible btw, no number is smaller or equal to 0 AND bigger or equal to 7

please brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
The following data lists the ages of a random selection of actresses when they won an award in the category of Best​ Actress, al
Valentin [98]

Answer:

a) p_v =P(t_{(9)}

The p value is higher than the significance level given 0.01, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And we can say that the true difference for Best Actresses is not significantly lower than the mean for Best​ Actors at 1% of significance.

b) The 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

c) We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

Let put some notation  

x=actor's age , y = actress's age

x: 58 41 36 36 34 33 48 37 37 43

y: 26 27 34 26 35 29 23 42 30 34

The system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: \mu_y- \mu_x \geq 0

Alternative hypothesis: \mu_y -\mu_x

The first step is calculate the difference d_i=y_i-x_i and we obtain this:

d: -32, -14, -2, -10, 1, -4, -25, 5, -7, -9

The second step is calculate the mean difference  

\bar d= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n d_i}{n}= -9.7

The third step would be calculate the standard deviation for the differences, and we got:

s_d =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (d_i -\bar d)^2}{n-1} =11.451

The 4 step is calculate the statistic given by :

t=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{-9.7 -0}{\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}}=-2.679

The next step is calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

df=n-1=10-1=9

Now we can calculate the p value, since we have a left tailed test the p value is given by:

p_v =P(t_{(9)}

The p value is higher than the significance level given 0.01, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And we can say that the true difference for Best Actresses is not significantly lower than the mean for Best​ Actors at 1% of significance.

Part b

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".  

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.  

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".  

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:  

\bar d \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} (1)  

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of \alpha=0.01 and \alpha/2 =0.005, and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,9)".And we see that t_{\alpha/2}=3.25  

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):  

-9.7-3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=-21.469  

-9.7+3.25\frac{11.451}{\sqrt{10}}=2.069  

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (-21.469;2.069)

Part c

We got the same conclusion as part a, sicne the confidence interval contains the value 0, we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis that the difference between the two means is 0.

8 0
3 years ago
The picture shows the footprints of a man walking. The pace length P is the distance between the rear of two consecutive footpri
Rina8888 [55]

Bernard’s walking speed is 140 meters per minute

Bernard’s walking speed is 8.4 kilometers per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

The pace length P is the distance between the rear of two consecutive footprints

The formula, n P = 140, gives an approximate relationship between n and P where,

  • n = number of steps per minute
  • P = pace length in meters
  • Bernard knows his pace length is 0.80 meters
  • The formula applies to Bernard’s walking

We need to calculate Bernard’s walking speed in meters per minute and in kilometers per hour

∵ n = number of steps per minute

∴ n unit is number / minute

∵ P = pace length in meters

∴ P unit is meter

- That means n P unit is meters/minute

∴ n P represents the speed in meters per second

∵ The formula applies to Bernard’s walking

∵ His pace length is 0.80 meters

∵ n P = 140

∴ n(0.8) = 140

- Divide both sides by 0.8

∴ n = 175

- That means he moves 175 steps per minute

∵ The distance he walks in minute = 175 × 0.8 = 140 meters/minute

∴ His speed is 140 meters per minute

Bernard’s walking speed is 140 meters per minute

∵ 1 km = 1000 m

∵ 1 hour = 60 minutes

- Divide the meters by 1000 and the minute by 60 to change

   from meters per minute to kilometers per hour

∴ His walking speed = \frac{140}{1000} ÷ \frac{1}{60}

- Change ÷ to × and reciprocal the fraction after the division sign

∴ His walking speed =  \frac{140}{1000} × \frac{60}{1} = 8.4 km/h

Bernard’s walking speed is 8.4 kilometers per hour

Learn more:

You can learn more about the speed in brainly.com/question/5461619

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 17 is what percent of 68?
    15·1 answer
  • Find the value of y and measure of m<3
    10·1 answer
  • The distance between points (X7, Yı) and (4, 8) is the square root of (x7 - 8)2 +
    8·1 answer
  • This graph relates the volumes of triangular pyramids with a base area of 12 square inches and their heights.
    6·1 answer
  • a restaurant automatically add an 18% tip to the bill. if the tip was $9, what was the bill before the tip was added, in dollars
    15·1 answer
  • What is -3 times x squared?
    9·1 answer
  • Adding Integers<br> -8+19+8?
    8·1 answer
  • Find the equation of the line passing through (1,4) with a gradient of 3
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • If function g is defined by the equation y − 3x = -14, which equation represents the function in function notation? A. g(x) = 3x
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!