Answer:
Carl Vinson - advocated that it was important for the US to have a strong naval fleet, represented Georgia for 51 years in the US House of Representatives, known as the "Father of the Two-Ocean Navy", helped create legaislation that led to the development of new military programs;
Richard B. Russell - represented Georgia for seven consecutive terms as a U.S. senator, efforts led to 15 new military facilities being built in Georgia;
Both - Served on the Armed Services Committee and gained influence on the military policy, helped prepare the US for World War II, help bring tens of thousands of new jobs and economic opportunities to Georgia.
Explanation:
Carl Vinson and Richard B. Russell were American politicians, who served in the US Congress and both were members of Democratic Party. Both were in office for a long time and helped development of military and navy of the USA. Vinson was primarily responsible for naval expansion and for new legislation regarding navy army. Both of them made an effort during World War II and had a strong position towards US enemies in the war.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, was the Genevan Enlightenment thinker was interested in the social and political experiences of humans and proposed that the role of the government was to reflect the will of the people.
<h3>Who was Jean-Jacques Rousseau?</h3>
This man was a writer a philosopher as well as a politician that was one of the persons that had influenced the French revolution at the time that it had occurred. He was one of the persons that brought about the enlightenment ideas on governance for the people.
Hence we can say that Jean-Jacques Rousseau, was the Genevan Enlightenment thinker was interested in the social and political experiences of humans and proposed that the role of the government was to reflect the will of the people.
Read more on enlightenment ideas here: brainly.com/question/1688832
#SPJ1
<u>Answer:</u>
This case was not meant to be a precedent and It was decided in a 5–4 vote.
Option: (A) and (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Bush v/s Gore case of 2000 was unusual because the Supreme Court decision in the case ordering the initial count to be considered as final brought a wave of mixed responses throughout the United States.
- The decision was voted 5-4 by the Supreme Court bench of 9 justices hearing the case.
- The critics interpreted from the judgment issued that the case was not meant to be taken as a precedent for any cases in the future.
The correct answer is differences between social work practice and research
Explanation: Even if an area is understood objectively, there are major differences in that area in practice. Often people believe that everything that has been studied will be directly applied, but the truth is that many things of the practice are learned only in practice, questions of experience and other particular questions that only the practice will offer.
