Answer:
Machiavelli's concept of "is it better to be feared or to be loved?" is presented in his book <em>'The Prince'.</em> He presents the notion that one should wish to be both love and feared, but, because it is difficult to be unite them in one person, it is much safer for the prince to be feared than loved. A Prince therefore must be feared. Only a Prince who is feared can provide security to life and property.
Explanation:
The Stations of the Cross are 14 events of Jesus' passion that Christians reflect on during Lent.
Answer: Social exchange theory and reciprocity norms both involve the understanding of the mutual benefits.
Explanation:
Social exchange theory: This is a sociological as well as psychological theory analysis the social behavior of the two parties during their interaction. This is associated with cost and benefit association. The parties think about the benefit and risk of their mutual association. According to the given situation, if my best friend ask me for moving the furniture out of the parent's house without bothering about me for many years and asking for favor for own motive. According to the social exchange theory I should help him by asking to get some own work done or I can ask him to pay some amount that will be utilized during the transportation and dislocation of the furniture. I may also think about the risk of transfer of the furniture as it may cause injury to be due to physical strain by lifting furniture.
Reciprocity norm: It is the process of exchange of things between people to attain mutual benefit. Here, I should ask for a help or money to my friend in return of favor of translocating the furniture.
Answer:
Face the flag, stand at attention, and place your right hand over your heart.
Explanation:
Do you salute flag in civilian clothes?
When Not to Salute
You don't have to salute indoors, except when you report to a superior officer. If either person is wearing civilian clothes and you do not recognize the other person as a superior officer, salutes are unnecessary.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
