The Roman Empire simply became too big. Rome became too extended, too expensive to be sustained by the available resources, and no fundamental technological breakthrough was available to enlarge these resources. In the Roman Empire between 235 and 284 C.E, some twenty-six individuals claimed the title of Roman emperor, only one of whom died of natural causes. The population of the Roman empire declined by 25% in the two centuries following 250 C.E, a demographic disaster that meant diminished production, less revenue for the state, and fewer men available for the defense of the empire’s long frontiers.
The argument in which requires inferential leap is an
argument defined by Wayne Brockriede and when argument is required to tackle inferential
leap, this is one of the six characteristics used in an argument I which is
being dictated by Wayne Brockriede.
If this question has the same set of options to choose from like the other ones posted previously, then the answer would be: letter B.<span>inhibition of RNA synthesis
</span>
Here are the choices:
<span>A) competitive inhibition with folic acid synthesis
B) inhibition of RNA synthesis
C) injury to plasma membrane
D) inhibition of cell wall synthesis
E) competitive inhibition with DNA gyrase</span>
Failed the trade for the Native Americans and the supplies didnt come because- and lack of food and it was winter and they got nothing. So many people died during that period
