If they were still living, Carnegie and Rockefeller would have supported Net Neutrality.
<h3>What is Net Neutrality?</h3>
- Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers must not be discriminatory in their dispensation of internet services. Andrew Carnegie was a popular American industrialist and philanthropist.
- He made waves in the steel and railroad industries and he founded the Carnegie Steel Company. Despite his great wealth, he indulged greatly in philosophy.
- John D. Rockefeller was another American who excelled in the petroleum industry. He was so rich that he once had 2% of the American economy's worth. He was also a philanthropist.
- Given the personalities of these individuals, they must have supported Net neutrality if they were still alive.
Learn more about net neutrality here:
brainly.com/question/12859325
Answer:
The Frankfurt National Assembly was at long last ready to embrace a proposed constitution for Germany on March 28, 1849. This report accommodated general document, parliamentary government, and an inherited head. Germany was to have a unified monetary and customs system yet would keep up the inward self-rule of the constituent German states.
Explanation:
A parliamentary parliament met in Frankfurt in March 1848 at the prompting of liberal pioneers from all the German states (Austria also included), and it required the election of a National assembly. The races were appropriately held, however the discretionary laws and techniques differed impressively from state to state, and on May 18 the National assembly met in the Church of St. Paul (Paulskirche) in Frankfurt. Moderate non-conformists held a lion's share in the assembly, however the whole political range was spoken to among its delegates. The liberal Heinrich von Gagern was chosen leader of the parliament.
It would be "traditional forms of poetry" that was not characteristic of the beat movement and the beat generation, since much of this movement had to do with "doing away" with tradition in many different aspects of life.
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Hoped this helped!
The modern day country of India gained its independence mostly in a peaceful manner. Led by Gandhi, the people of India were getting out on protests constantly for a prolonged period of time. Great Britain, weakened from the wars, saw that it will not be able to control this massive country and massive population, so a decision was made that an independence is granted to India. The way in which the independence came did not came to a very positive reaction, the reason being that the historic territory was divided into three separate countries, largely based on religion, with Pakistan and Bangladesh being the two separated territories. The joy of freedom was quickly replaced by numerous conflicts based mostly on religion, with the Hindu and Muslim populations clashing with each other, and millions of people suffering because of it.
