I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today. Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music. In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
The classical music is music that is created from or rooted in, Western culture traditions, both religious and secular Conventional music.
Classical composers moved toward more to there music, because there is no stress, or escape in music without dissonance and it is all very boring, bland and Anything modern and certainly not limited.
That's why the answer is "moved toward more
".
Three of the things the Marshall Plan was designed to do were to stabilize war-town Europe, prevent the rise of communist states, and prevent the rise of violent dictators.
It's letter C Beacuse <span>is the historical period during which the exercise of power in Mexico was under control of Porfirio <span>Diaz.</span></span>
They contended with economic hardships born out of rapidly declining farm prices, prohibitively high tariffs on items they needed to purchase, and foreign competition
