Point X is at 2/3 on a number line on the number line point why is the same distance from 0 is point X but has a numerator of 8
1 answer:
Answer:
Denominator
x = 12
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the denominator of the fraction at point y.
Given:
Point X is at 2/3 on a number line from 0.
On the same line, point y is the same point from 0.
Numerator of the fraction at point y is 8.
We need to find the denominator of the fraction at point y.
Solution:
From the above statement the distance from 0 to point X and 0 to point Y is same, so point X is equal to Y.
By cross multiplication.
Therefore, the denominator of the fraction at point y is 12.
You might be interested in
Answer:
The P-value of this sample is 0 and is less than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
As there is significant evidence to reject , we can say that there is significant evidence to claim that the mean time delay for the hypothetical population of all persons who may be subjected to the stimulus differs from 1.6 seconds.
The significance level for this test is 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, we want to prove if there is significant evidence that the mean differs from 1.6 seconds. That is the same as having evidence to reject the the hypothesis (the null hypothesis always have the equal sign).
We have to test the null hypothesis
The significance level for this test is 0.05
Calculation of the t-statistic:
If we look up in a t-table for t=9.47 and df=(36-1)=35, we get this value appears with a probability of zero. A large number like that is very unlikely to happen.
The P-value of this sample is 0 and is less than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
As there is significant evidence to reject , we can say that there is significant evidence to claim that the mean time delay for the hypothetical population of all persons who may be subjected to the stimulus differs from 1.6 seconds.