Explanation:
A company's leadership team is an essential part of the company's strategic development and decision-making process.
Therefore, the leadership team will directly influence organizational performance in the short and long term, in the sense that this team will be responsible for the strategic planning that will contemplate the long term in the organization and help it to reach its goals and objectives.
The decision-making process, on the other hand, will impact the company in the short term and will be essential for the decisions made to be beneficial for the improvement of organizational processes and the achievement of competitive and financial advantages.
Answer:
The value of this stock today should be $6.22
Explanation:
The company will start paying dividends 2 years from today that is at t=2. The dividends received 2 years from today can be denoted as D2. The constant growth model of DDM will be used to calculate the price of this stock at t=2 as the growth rate in dividends is constant forever.
The price at t=2 will then be discounted back to its present value today to calculate the price of this stock today.
The price of this stock at t=2 will be,
P2 = D2 * (1+g) / (r - g)
P2 = 0.6 * (1+0.04) / (0.12 - 0.04)
P2 = $7.8
The value of this stock today should be,
P0 = 7.8 / (1+0.12)^2
P0 = $6.218 ROUNDED OFF TO $6.22
Answer:
Explicit costs - $51,000
Explicit costs are those for which a person incurs in actual spending of money. In this case, Christine had to pay $15,000 in wages, and $36,000 in rent ($3,000 x 12). These are expenses that she had to pay money for, and that had to be accounted for in the accounting books, and in the financial statements. These are in other words, explicit costs.
Implicit costs - $40,000
Implicit costs are simply the opportunity costs. An opportunity cost is the cost of the next more valuable alternative when faced with two or more options. No money is paid for this costs. The implicit costs for Christine were the $40,000 that she not receive as wages if she had continued working at a real state firm.
Answer:
Hammer would prevail against Kay based on:_______.
A. Unilateral contract.
Explanation:
A unilateral contract is a contract created by an offer that can only be accepted by performance. To form the contract, the party making the offer (called the “offeror”) makes a promise in exchange for the act of performance by the other party.
in relation to the case in the contract, Hammer had carried out the duties expected of him thus making the contract valid under a unilateral contract.
since in a unilateral contract, the offer can only be accepted when the other party completely performs the requested action.
Hence Hammer would prevail against Kay based on Unilateral contract.
Did you ever find the answer?
