Answer:
The aftertax salvage value of the machine is D) $10,134
Explanation:
Hi. first, we need to find out the book value of the machine at the selling date, that is 3 years from now, and the book value is as follows.
Since taxes are based on the profit you make by selling something, our profit is:
Therefore, our taxes are:
So, the after tax salvage value of the machine is the money you received on the sale minus the taxes you have to pay, that is:
Salvage Value of the Machine = $12,000 - $1,866?= $10,134
That is option D)
Best of luck.
Answer and Explanation:
The ethical issues that occurs in the case when a corporate insider wants to purchase or sells in the firm where an individual works are as follows:
1. The information could be misuse
2. It would become unfair for the investors
3. The trust could be broke also it would create the discrimination with the other investors
4. The insider trading lowers the size of the market that ultimately decrease the volatility of the market
To quickly move from one page to another in a publication, you can use the page down key on your keyboard.
The page down key on the keyboard will allow you to go immediately down to the next page of the document. Another option that would also allow you to do this is by using the arrow icon at the top of the screen that points to the right. If available, this will also take you to the next page.
Answer: $688.17
Explanation:
He has to pay $60 every month on the first day or a lump sum.
The lump sum will be the present value of monthly payments.
This is a stable Cashflow and so is an Annuity and because it is done on the first day of the month it is an Annuity due.
Calculating present value of annuity due is;
= Annuity + Annuity (( 1 - ( 1 + r) ^ -(n - 1)) / r)
= 60 + 60 (( 1 - ( 1 + 0.833%)-¹¹) / 0.833%) )
=60 + 60* 10.4695
= $688.17
Note: interest rate must be divided into 12 to make it monthly rate.
=10%/12
= 0.833%
Answer:
The answer is "Whenever a court requires him to use the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, he possibly would succeed".
Explanation:
Res ipsa loquitur is also an English common law doctrine which claims in an action for tort, throughout the absence of direct proof on whether any defendant acted, a jury may conclude neglect of the nature of an illness or incident. It is used in circumstances in which the complainant is not presented sufficient proof that the offender is not liable.
