Answer: b. dialectical thinking.
Explanation:
Dialectical thinking is a way of reasoning in which the person thinks and synthesis the two opposing viewpoints on the same situation, topic or object. The dialectical thinking is a feature of one's cognitive ability.
The dialectical thinking is supported by the new experiences and interpersonal interaction with the daily life situations.
According to the given situation, here, Aldrich is showing a change in opinion about the same topic. This is the outcome of the dialectical thinking which has been generated due to comparison between previously known facts that honesty is a best policy but honesty is not always beneficial for the person thus has created two opposing view points. This is the outcome of development of the cognitive flexibility.
Answer:
Ego
Explanation:
Erik Erikson was widely known for his psychosocial theory of development, having modified Freud’s theory of psychosexual. However, in Erikson attempt to explain his psychosocial theory of development, placed more important role on how ego in each personality determines positive contributions to development of an individual, specifically in mastering attitudes, ideas, and skills at each stage of development.
Hence, the ability to grasp these developmental attitudes provides the children needed growth that is essential to their success and making of positive contributions as members of the society.
Therefore, Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the EGO than Freud had allowed.
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
If I'm sure I remember that will be C.command economy
D.
I believe is the answer
Hope this helps, sorry if not tho
