Answer:
Find and describe connections between the ideas that are shared.
Explanation:
The question asks you to choose the action that is “most likely to help or improve a COLLABORATIVE discussion about literature.”
Let’s look at the options.
Choice 2: Choose one person to call on people who wish to speak about the story.
• This could foster collaboration, but it could also give one student too much power and in the process, take away the voices of others.
Choice 3: Argue with each person who shares a perspective on the story.
• Arguing brings about hostility rather than collaboration.
Choice 4: Give each person exactly one minute to speak before letting someone else talk.
• This could foster collaboration by giving people equal opportunities to talk, but such rigid guide lines could also limit the freedom and flow of a discussion.
That leaves us with the first choice, which makes the most sense and has no negative side to it.
The answer is c. read the chapter over again
Answer:
Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions—the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.
Explanation:
Answer: In this step, you should look for any features the text has such as bold words or italics. Check for pictures too. Also look for new vocab words, hope that helped haha
Explanation:
