1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zanzabum
3 years ago
7

What was a result of the French and Indian War?

History
2 answers:
Paraphin [41]3 years ago
8 0

C. The colonists learned they didn't have much in common with the British

Elodia [21]3 years ago
5 0

The only correct answer can be statement C.

The British and the America colonists work together to defeat the French in the French and Indian War, showing that statement A cannot be correct.

One result of the French and Indian War was France giving up a large amount of territory to the British. This included a significant part of modern day Canada. This shows that statement B is wrong.

Statement D is also incorrect because the French lost land.

This shows how only statement C. can be correct.

You might be interested in
How did Hitler rise to power? What did he promise the people?
kenny6666 [7]

Hitler pledged to restore prosperity, create civil order (by crushing industrial strikes and street demonstrations by communists and socialists), eliminate the influence of Jewish financiers, and make the fatherland once again a world power.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you think the location of mountain ranges in the United States has affected settlement and development?
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

I think the location of the mountain ranges in the U.S. has effected the settlement and development because of the weather. The weather affects the farming.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did African American pursue higher education despite their exclusion from white institutions?
koban [17]

They moved to different places that accepted blacks and started secret schools taught by willing whites.

6 0
3 years ago
Were groups that advocated the use of violence in the 1960s justified in doing so? Why or why not?
ANTONII [103]

Answer: Very few groups in the 1960s advocated violence, except the US government, in the form of military adventure, where they went far beyond advocating. A total of about 1,353,000 deaths occurred on all sides in the Vietnam war. Then there was/is the Klu Klux Klan. We need to be watchful even now. The Weathermen were a small organization and they claimed not to intend violence, but use it if “necessary.” The Black Panthers called themselves a party of “self defense.” Whether or how often individuals in the latter two groups deviated from their charters (if any) is hard to determine.

Anyway people can justify their actions of violence it doesn't mean it was justification for everybody.

3 0
3 years ago
During the period from 1600 to 1700 European rulers were mostly interested in
Marysya12 [62]
Trade and tea and castles
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which event was an immediate cause of the reign of terror during the French Revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • Need help plz Identify the various risks and benefits associated with overseas ventures as a mode of entry into global markets.
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the religious beliefs of Henry IV when he became king.
    15·2 answers
  • What was 19th century liberalism in world history
    10·1 answer
  • Columbian exchange sentence
    13·2 answers
  • What caused the United States to enter world war 1 after three Years of neutrality
    6·1 answer
  • What is the main idea that Plato states in this passage?:
    6·2 answers
  • Why did people want to make changes during the progressive era
    12·2 answers
  • What action did Calhoun take during the Nullification Crisis?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the authors main purpose in writing this article?Cite evidence from the text in your response.DUCK & COVER: SCHOOL D
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!