Hello there!
The correct answer is B. Even the king must respect certain rights of the people.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
The examples are:
<span>-deciding whether a second burger is worth the extra $2
-deciding whether the overtime pay is worth working on your day off
-deciding whether to pay a fine for polluting the local harbor or installing antipollution machinery
In rational behavior, our decision-making process is always based on which decision give the maximum/optimal benefit for use, after deducting all possibilities with a logical approach.
All the actions above represents this very concept of rational behavior.
</span>
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The defendant, that is, his guilt, can only be clearly defined by material evidence.
The motive says a lot about the character of the act committed, but the motives of the crime are null and void without proof.
If the motive requires the sole reason for the commission of the crime, such treatment can be devastating to the truth, since in that case, the evidence sheds light.
The motive is the starting point of the investigator in the search for truth. The danger of taking a motive in this context can lead the investigation into the "wrong track". Finally, a motive for committing a crime without any person having done the same.
Answer: This can be one
Explanation:
One way is that the leaders of each country can affiliate with each other, whether this be something as a meeting or simply letters sent to one another. Another is through trade.
C.it spurred economic development
