Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Answer: The misappropriation theory
Explanation:
The misappropriation theory is basically describe about the various types of security fraud violation against the data source.
It is basically uses for the insider trading and when the individual person misusing the confidential data or information and also violating all the securities laws.
According to the question, the given argument is basically describe about the misappropriation theory.
Therefore, The misappropriation theory is the correct answer.
Answer:
The expected return that IMI can provide subject to Johnson's risk constraint is 8.5%
Explanation:
Capital Market Line (CML)
Expected return on the market portfolio, E(
) = 12 %
Standard deviation on the market portfolio, σ
= 20%
Risk-free rate, 
= 5%
E(
) = + [ E(
) - ] × ( σ
÷ σ)
= 0.05 + [ 0.12 - 0.05] × (0.10 ÷ 0.20)
= 8.5%
<h2>Depending on the need would be the apt answer for this type of question.</h2>
Explanation:
Employees normally consider meeting as waste of time, or they might sell products instead of attending meeting. We must re-insist the purpose of meeting.
Meeting,
- can make employer understand employee better and vice-versa
- is to communicate latest update, expectation
- is to track current events and to hand-hold wherever necessary
- is to review the road map to reach the organizational goals
- is to appreciate the best work so that it would be a motivational factor for everyone
- meant to trigger the work more efficiently
The meeting are organized to support both organization and employees to be on track and it is scheduled only as per need. So it is not often and whenever it is essential.
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The master budget of Windy Compay shows that the planned activity level for next year is expected to be 50000 machine hours. At this level of activity, the following manufacturing overhead costs are expected: Indirect labor $720000 Machine supplies 180000 Indirect materials 210000 Depreciation on factory building 150000
Total manufacturing overhead $1,260,000
A flexible budget for a level of activity of 60000 machine hours would show total manufacturing overhead costs of:
Variable overhead= 720,000 + 180,000 + 210,000= 1,110,000
Unitary variable overhead= 1,110,000/50,000= 22.2
For 60,000 units:
Total overhead= 22.2*60,000 + 150,000= $1,482,000
