Answer: D. The actual value of the contract is less than $30 million for each year he plays.
Explanation:
Given that Mark sherzer will be paid $15 million per year for 14 years reflects a contract whose value at the time of signing is ($15 million × 14) = $210 million. However, the payment would not be paid at the of signing but spread over a period of 14 years with $15 million being splashed out annually. However, considering the time value of money, whereby the present value of a fixed amount decreases with time. Hence in actual sense, the $210 million face worth of the contract will actually be less than $30 million [$210/7(playing years)] as time progresses on the fixed amount paid yearly due to reduction in the value of the present value as time progresses.
Answer:
Answer for the question
Some observers had argued that Uber’s greatest problem was not any of its scandals, but its CEO Travis Kalanick. Now that Kalanick no longer serves that role, how much better off is Uber really? Where do you come down? Do you think Kalanick’s reduced profile will turn the tide for Uber? Or is Kalanick’s drive and competitiveness necessary to Uber’s continued success, regardless of the title he holds? If you were on the board, what would you recommend? And why?
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.
Explanation:
To determine whether the company should raise the selling price, we need to determine the effect on income. <u>The best option is the one with the higher sales revenue.</u>
Sales revenue= selling price * number of units
<u>Current:</u>
Sales revenue= 5.5*2,200= $12,100
<u>Proposal:</u>
Sales revenue= 7.5*1,800= $13,500
It is more profitable to raise the selling price by $2.
Answer:
1- Wages Expense (Dr.) $1,025
Wages Payable (Cr.) $1,025
2- Wages Expense (Dr.) $1,845
Wages Payable (Cr.) $1,025
Cash (Cr.) $820
Explanation:
Wages expense = $205 * 5 days a week = $1,025 per week.
Wages expense = $205 * 4 days a week = $820 per week.
