Answer:
D. The investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' IP addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed.
Explanation:
Keep in mind that breach of information during on-line survey could be the researcher's fault or subject's fault, depending on how they secure their internet connection.
- Method A is not suitable because of this phrase: 'confidentiality cannot be assured' . This will make the subject thinks that the researchers are not taking responsibilities in protecting the information.
-Method B is not suitable because it create a physical location where people could come in and directly steal the data of all the subjects,
- Method C is not suitable because it does not educate the subjects with the possibilities that they can personally made the mistake that can cause the breach of information.
- Method D is the most suitable because it conveys that the research team is making their full efforts to ensure the anonymity of the subjects and also educate them regarding the possibilities of breach information from the subject's mistake. (it would be even better if the investigator advised the subjects to use trusted VPN services.)
I think they can, because depending on how much the person has to offer it can provide tough facts for political viewpoints.
I believe the answer is: <span>There are numerous and variable interpretations of events and their significance.
In examining history, we have to see each events from the perspective of all the individuals and groups that are involved in the story.
If we only make an interpretation based on one individual;s or one group's point of view, the information would most likely catered in a way that make them appear to have positive attitude/characteristics.</span>
Answer: a) never abandoned the party hacks who had brought him to success.
Explanation: Warren harding never abandoned the party hacks because their intentions were more aligned with his winning than personal agendas or objectives, this was noticeable in him winning the 1920 elections which made him the 29th president of the United States, thus led him to become loyal to his party hacks.
