After many weeks or months of preparation, the prosecutor is ready for the most important part of his job: the trial. The trial is a structured process where the facts of a case are presented to a jury, and they decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charge offered. During trial, the prosecutor uses witnesses and evidence to prove to the jury that the defendant committed the crime(s). The defendant, represented by an attorney, also tells his side of the story using witnesses and evidence.
In a trial, the judge — the impartial person in charge of the trial — decides what evidence can be shown to the jury. A judge is similar to a referee in a game, they are not there to play for one side or the other but to make sure the entire process is played fairly.
Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed. The court must set the place of trial within the district with due regard for the convenience of the defendant, any victim, and the witnesses, and the prompt administration of justice.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Western Europe.
Explanation:
The colonial era of the United States covers the European colonization from the 16th century until the creation of the colonies. During the late times of the 16th century, many of the European countries began a process of conquering the American continent. Among them, it was France, Spain, Britain, and the Netherlands.
From the countries given all of them except Spain who focused more on Central and South America began to arrive in the United States. European settlers came from different social and religious groups, adventurers, farmers, tradesmen, and aristocracy.
I hope this answer helps you.
FDR believed in a "hands on" approach to help solve the Great Depression. He favored federal government activity and the New Deal enacted laws that influenced society on a daily basis on the part of the federal government. Hoover believed in a balanced budget and not pumping government money into the economy.
Answer:While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor.
Explanation:
