All categories

3 years ago

Modern : antiquated :: weak : potent meager bond languid

2 answers:

8 0

Modern and antiquated are antonyms. So in order to do this assignment, you need to provide an antonym of the word weak. In this case, the correct answer is potent because potent means strong.

Further Explanation:

Potent means:

extremely solid, dislike a weight lifter. Utilize strong rather to portray things like serious scents, incredible enchantment elixirs, and exceptionally powerful individuals. From the Latin potentum, signifying "amazing," powerful is only that: having huge quality or impact in either a good or physical sense.

Highly potent drug :

An exceptionally intense medication (e.g., fentanyl, alprazolam, risperidone) brings out a given reaction at low focuses, while a medication of lower strength (meperidine, diazepam, ziprasidone) summons a similar reaction just at higher fixations. Higher intensity does not really mean progressively symptoms.

Sentence Examples of potent:

Excessively mindful of him, she strained as he hunkered next to her, the fragrance too strong to even think about being a fantasy. The degree and charm of his realm practiced an intense spell on western Europe.

potent smell:

Potent methods extremely solid, dislike a weight lifter. Utilize strong rather to depict things like serious scents, ground-breaking enchantment mixtures, and persuasive individuals. From the Latin potentum, signifying "amazing," strong is only that: having huge quality or impact in either a good or physical sense.

Subject: English

Level: High School

Keywords: Potent means, Highly potent drug, Sentence Examples of potent, potent smell.

Related links:

Learn more about evolution on

brainly.com/question/1867058

https://brainly.in/question/5013990

trapecia [35]3 years ago

4 0

In order to complete this analogy, first you have to understand the relationship between the first two words. Modern and antiquated are antonyms, which means they have opposite meanings. So in order to do this assignment, you need to provide an antonym of the word weak. In this case, the correct answer is potent, because potent means strong.
Meager means inadequate, bond is a noun and cannot be used here, and languid means sickly or weak, so that would be a synonym.

You might be interested in

Sedimentary rocks can be identified as conglomerate because of which of the following?

aniked [119]

The correct answer is D

Can you help me with my question?

Identify the figurative language used in the sentence below (taken from the text)

"...they (rumors) were now for the most part black creatures who flapped their wings drearily near to the ground and refused to rise on any wings of hope."

a) simile

b) metaphor

c) alliteration

Choose the most accurate paraphrase for the sentence below.

"No respite was given the troops. Instead they were driven back into the fracas on the sward."

a) The troops had no rest, but were driven back into the woods by the sword.

b) The troops had no food, but had to continue fighting in the woods.

c) The troops had no rest, but had to return to the fight in the field.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What did Wilson do to Myrtle? Why?

kirza4 [7]

Answer:

What did Wilson do to Myrtle? Why? Wilson locked Myrtle in her room and planned to keep her there for 2 days. Wilson does this because he comes to believe that Myrtle is having an affair and wants to quickly move away.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This man is most likely а ..

lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

Explanation:

????????

8 0

2 years ago

BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!

Tanya [424]

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.

some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.

in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.

in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.

another way to look at it would be one of the most difficult issues in foreign policy is deciding when the United States should exercise military force. Most people think that military force may be used if a vital national interest of the United States is threatened. The difficulty lies in getting people to agree on what constitutes a vital national interest.

Almost everyone would agree that an attack by a foreign country on the United States threatens a vital interest. Many also would think a vital interest threatened if a country attacked a nation that we had signed a security agreement with. Disagreements emerge when the threat involves the free flow of a precious commodity, such as oil. They also surface over situations that do not pose an immediate threat to U.S. security but could imperil it in the future, such as when a region becomes unstable and the instability may lead to wider conflicts. Another area of debate opens over human rights and humanitarian efforts. The United States is the most powerful democratic nation on Earth. Does that mean we always have a vital interest in promoting human rights and democracy? Or, should we stay out of the affairs of other nations unless they threaten other of our national interests?

Another issue arises over how the United States should exercise military force. Some argue that America should never act unilaterally, but should only act with others, allies or particularly with the United Nations. They believe America has a strong interest in upholding international law. Others agree that it is appropriate to act in coalitions, but they think demanding it in every circumstance would paralyze America’s role as a world leader.

7 0

3 years ago

2. What type of fallacy is represented by the passage below?

VikaD [51]

Answer:

Ad hominem attack

Explanation:

A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning.

Ad hominem (literally translated as <em>to the person</em>) is a type of logical fallacy in which a person criticizes or attacks another person, rather than what they are saying. Here, the speaker doesn't critize the mentioned poem. They don't give explanations about why the poem is not good. They simply attack the writer, stating that they are a sick and morbid person. That is not a valid reason as to why someone shouldn't read a poem.

6 0

3 years ago