Truman’s policy was more defensive than offensive. This can be seen in the Marshall Plan where he used economically to rebuild war-torn as an incentive to promote democracy. Though he would not use military force, He vowed to support countries against communism and this was seen in the establishment of NATO as a deterrent to Russian expansion.
Answer:
-- Japan's leaders were refusing to surrender.
-- US resources had been stretched thin, and the United States' ability to invade was limited.
-- Japan's ability to make war had been badly crippled.
-- The United States was inflicting heavy damage by bombing Japan's cities.
Explanation:
Harry S. Truman was one of the greatest and one of the famous Presidents of the United States of America. He served as the 33rd President to the United States of America. He is well known all over he world mainly as the man who dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki of Japan to put an end to World War II.
The United States wanted to avoid casualties resulting from the invasion of Japan and also to end the war quickly. The Japanese leaders did not wanted to surrender and they were crippling the war by heavy bombarding and killing everybody. Besides the USA's resources also stretched out and the US was inflicting heavy damages by attacking may of the Japanese cities. Hence Truman decided to attack Japan with the atomic bomb in the year 1945.
Answer:
Communist
the communist wanted equality and everyone had to have the same as everyone else
Answer:
Renewable energy has several advantages and disadvantages. The advantages of renewable energy include unlimited supply, low environmental impact, and increased opportunities for employment. While these advantages are nice, there are some disadvantages. These include less reliability than nonrenewable energy, difficulty storing and transporting the energy, and higher costs.
I hope this helps :)
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "bias", since this implies that the author is not speaking from a place of objectivity, but instead is trying to pursue an "agenda".</span></span>
