1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
salantis [7]
2 years ago
9

1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.

History
1 answer:
fredd [130]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful. 

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's. 

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

You might be interested in
Which system did the new government created under the constitution use
pogonyaev
They used the Federal Republic. :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one power the supreme court has over the judicial court
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

The President (Executive Branch) has the power to appoint US Supreme Court justices and other (Article III ) federal judges. subject to approval by the Senate. He can and does choose judges who subscribe to his own legal philosophy and so can possibly shape future court opinions. The judges serve for life and their stance on future cases is hard to predict in many cases.

The president can also grant pardons for federal offenses

One is the fact that the judicial branch needs the executive branch to enforce its decisions. As an example, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional in Brown v. Bd. of Education of Topeka, it took the President's ordering the National Guard out to make some states abide by the ruling. The Judicial Branch has no way to enforce its decisions without the executive's co-operation.. Another is the fact that it is the executive branch that nominates the judges in the first place. As a practical matter, presidents nominate persons who share the same political beliefs they do. This has the effect of creating (or trying to create) a judicial branch that will interpret the Constitution the way that that president would like. Trouble is, once a Supreme Court Justice is confirmed, nothing can be done to force him or her to rule in a particular way. They are appointed with lifetime tenure on good behavior and their salaries cannot be diminished while they are in office.. And as to salaries, nothing says a president has to include raises for them in any budget he proposes.

The Executive branch gets to choose candidates for federal judgeships, including Supreme Court Justices. The President also has the power to pardon people convicted of federal offenses, Since the President controls the Department of Justice, he has some leeway in how laws are enforced.

8 0
3 years ago
What did george washington do to get aid and advice?
iris [78.8K]
He got the France to join him in the war
8 0
2 years ago
Why don't humans buckle down and make laws stricter to prevent crime? The only people it would affect is the criminals! It would
Rudiy27
I think its because they are trying there best to keep people like hunters able to legaly hunt but they actauly dont hunt
8 0
3 years ago
How long does it take for lactic acid to build up in your thighs
madam [21]
Lactic acid is produced during anaerobic respiration, which is a form of cellular respiration in which oxygen is not present. Lactic acid is produced when you exercise, and it causes your muscles to become tired. It depends how long until you feel the effects of lactic acid, but getting oxygen to your muscles can slow the build-up. Hope this helps! :)
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the staple drink of the southern united states?
    14·2 answers
  • Imagine you are giving a speech to your class about reasons why the United States rapidly formed over a dozen states in the West
    11·1 answer
  • The electoral college has many weaknesses. Several reform plans have been suggested to strengthen these weaknesses. Which plan w
    14·2 answers
  • 6 is added to four times a number the result is 50 Find the number
    13·2 answers
  • If an american became ill in the 1870s, __________.
    15·1 answer
  • How did America's involvement in World War II impact race relations in the military?
    9·1 answer
  • Who named a country after themselves
    5·1 answer
  • When spain controlled texas, friars raised cattle for food. (true/false)
    15·1 answer
  • Which best describes the beginning of the American Revolutionary War?
    15·2 answers
  • here are some free point for all you people out there that atually helpes others instead of sending a link i appreciate it
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!