Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Spending variance for supplies = Standard cost - Actual cost
Standard cost formulae = $1,110 per month + $11 per frame
Standard cost for actual output = $1,110 + ($11 × 611)
= $1,110 + $6,721
= $7,831
But actual cost = $8,250
Therefore,
Spending variance would be
= $7,831 - $8,250
= $419 unfavourable
The spending variance for supplies cost in November is closest to $419 unfavourable
Answer: "a) the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination"
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all areas of public life including work. In the case of Artur, who put a claim against Banquet under the Americans with disabilities act, he has to show that the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination.
On a linear demand curve, if the price is low and the quantity demanded is high, demand is Inelastic in that region and a price increase will cause an increase in total revenue
Revenue in accounting refers to the entire amount of money made through the sale of products and services that are essential to the company's core operations. [1] The term "commercial revenue" can also refer to sales or turnover. Some businesses make money from royalties, interest, or other fees. [2] The term "revenue" can mean income in general or the total amount of money earned over a certain time period, as in "Last year, Company X had revenue of $42 million." The general definition of profits or net income is total revenue less total expenses for a specific time period. Revenue is a component of the Equity section of the balance sheet in accounting, and revenue raises equity.
learn more about revenue:
brainly.com/question/8645356
#SPJ4
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
