All right.
Differences with the Historical Model:
1. That model shows the planet's orbits as perfect circles, not ellipses.
<span>2. Aristotle believed in a geocentric (Earth centered) solar system, while it actually is heliocentric Sun centered). </span>
<span>3. That model didn't show all the planets we know today, such as Neptune, Uranus, etc. </span>
<span>4. A lot of that model was based on religious beliefs.
</span>Differences with Modern Model:
1. Our model shows the orbits as ellipses.
<span>2. Our model shows a heliocentric solar system. </span>
<span>3. Our model shows all the planets we know today. </span>
<span>4. Our model has nothing to do with religion.
</span>Similarities Between Both Models:
1. They both are based on the same solar system.
<span>2. They both show the inner planets, the Moon, the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn. </span>
<span>3. The both were made by many observations of the sky.
</span>
Hope this helps.:b
If the producers were removed then there would be no beginning to the food chain and the complete ecosystem would die off. If the detrivores and decomposers were removed there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals habitat.The ecosystem will be fill by plants and animal wastes as <span>there will be no decomposition of waste material.</span>
False. The bigger it is, the heavier it is, and gravity would pull it down faster.
Eutrophication can result from excess nutrients pollution in bodies of water
