<span>C. Power would be shared among three branches of government.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the lesson notes or the link to them, to know what you are talking about. Neither the articles of the authors Arquilla and Weimann.
However, trying to help, we did some research and can comment on the following.
It is true that enhanced communication has allowed for the growth of "networks" of organizations. The pro of these new networks is that it allows people who have similar thoughts or opinions, to have a formal channel of communication to express their points of views and fight for their causes.
The con of these new actors on the international stage is that not all have the best intentions in mind. Some of them can use the new networks for negative purposes as in the case of terrorist groups. For instance, John Arquilla affirms that most of these groups are formed to protest against the policies of governments or are anti-status quo.
Some of these groups promote an environmental agenda, civil rights, support any particular ideology or country in disgrace, or simply critique the performance of a public official or government.
State laws can make it difficult for some people to vote because some require people to present states IDs. Some make it easy and allowing a person to vote early, or on election-day. The votings turnout varies greatly between different states because of the rules that are required when voting
The correct answer is C. Tibetan Lama
Explanation:
Before the early 1600s, Bhutan, a country in Asia, was divided into multiple kingdoms each with differences in terms of political power, religion, culture, among others. This division ended around 1616 when a Lama or Buddhist spiritual leader from Tibet known as Ngawang Namgyal unified all the territory of Buthan, created a constitution or code for all the territory, and establish Buddism as the religion, which created a unified nation. Thus, it was a Tibetan Lama the one that consolidated Bhutan.
Answer/Explanation
The Treaty of Versailles could have been improved in many ways. First, more countries could have helped pay for the damage, The treaty gave some German territories to neighboring countries and placed other German territories. It would have been a more settled argument if they used the 14 points which were general and not bias. they could have made it better by more countries could have helped pay for the damage because all of the countries took part in this war. international disarmament, free trade, an international legal system, and collective security. Wilson believed war could be eliminated from the world with democracy, self-determination of rule for all nations, open diplomacy, This also could have been improved because the treaty of Versailles only blamed one country.
