Answer:
I believe that since Germany had just lost World War 1 they had to pay off all their debts, leaving them in an economic depression. Therefore, when Hitler began to speak and present himself infront of people, they saw him as a strong power of hope. He was the only one who brought gave hope to turn their economy around in such a depressing time. As a result, most Germans just wanted their lives, jos, money, and family to turn back to normal. They we're blind-sighted by what Hitler actually meant he was doing. They supported the Nazi's because Hitler blamed the Jews for why their economy was at such a low point. Most Germans believed what Hitler said and wanted to get back at the Jews for what they alledegly did. Hitler made the Germans live in fear of "what the Jews were doing".
Explanation:
There are many theories to power, be they liberal, socialist or otherwise. Many have been developed over centuries of thought, which pick apart the very nature of our society and world order. But of all the theories that I’ve come across, one sticks out more than any other, and it is the reason I hold such strong free-market/anti-state views. It’s called Public Choice theory, but don’t ask me why, because it seems to explain why any one but ’the public’ makes choices today.
Public Choice theory is modern, having only really taken off during the 1960’s, but I believe it grants a very realistic and worrying view of Britain’s power structure, and exposes many very deep scars which socialism and Keynesianism unintentionally inflicted on our country. It was heavily developed by the US economist James Buchanan, who won the 1986 Nobel Memorial Prize for his work, and who advised Margaret Thatcher through the Institute for Economic Affairs during the late 1970′s.
Just like capitalism, Public Choice theory is based on two simple assumptions about human nature. Firstly, that humans are principally self-interested. That’s not to say we’re selfish, which is somewhat more immoral, but rather that we will always aim to fulfil our wants and desires, economic or otherwise. Secondly, that humans are rational; when presented with a series of options, we will select whichever makes us the most happy for the least cost. Rational Choice theory, as it is called, has come under substantial intellectual attack in the past, and I don’t personally believe that all humans act completely rationally all the time, but as a model for human behaviour, I’d say it provides a pretty good analysis.
Most of the people working before WW2 was males, with females doing all the house work, and told to "not get any outside jobs". However, during WW2, all the males were called to serve in the army, which left a lot of vacant space that needed to be filled. The women filled these positions, and took over producing war material. After WW2, some women returned to working at home, however many still wanted to work outside. This led to a shifting workforce of dominately males inside the workforce to more of a half-and-half.
hope this helps
the real true answer is they didnt want to seem racist and it is now required by law to give a certain amount of scholarships to minoritys
Answer:
that i cant quite answer but maybe helping people and talking them to it and dont do anything to cause sicknesses or getting sick yourself
Explanation:
